8371347: Move the ObjectMonitorTable to a separate new file

[fbredber]

The request to move the ObjectMonitorTable to a separate new file came from this review comment: #27915 (comment)

By moving the ObjectMonitorTable implementation out of runtime/synchronizer.cpp into runtime/objectMonitorTable.[ch]pp will make a future transition from the current ObjectMonitorTable implementation to a new (and better) implementation appear more clean.

Passes tier1-7 without any problems that can be traced to this PR.

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8371347: Move the ObjectMonitorTable to a separate new file (Enhancement - P4)

Reviewers

• David Holmes (@dholmes-ora - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28565/head:pull/28565
$ git checkout pull/28565

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/28565
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28565/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 28565

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 28565

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28565.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back fbredberg! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@fbredber This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8371347: Move the ObjectMonitorTable to a separate new file

Reviewed-by: dholmes

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 1 new commit pushed to the master branch:

• 282f339: 8369432: Add Support for JDBC 4.5 MR

Please see this link for an up-to-date comparison between the source branch of this pull request and the master branch.
As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[openjdk]

@fbredber The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

• hotspot-runtime

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (764e6692)

[dholmes-ora]

Seems fine. I did not verify line by line :)

Thanks

[coleenp]

If you're able to hide more of the implementation in the cpp file it'll be less dramatic when you change it.

[coleenp]

Can you hide all of this in the .cpp file like symbolTable.cpp hides the CHT implementation instead of having it all in the hpp file? The interface only needs to be the functions at the end.