Conversation
This is a proprietary codec and it's uncertain who can use it, and under what conditions. At this point, Opus is stable and a suitable replacement.
|
The following links are available:
build (macOS-latest, full) build (windows-latest, full) |
|
I agree, though generally I sense we should probably improve the Opus controls a bit before doing this so that people at least have some tuning in how they want to handle things? |
|
if we have permissions to use it, it seems like we could keep this? if opus becomes the default and is configurable, that’s great, but we might have situations where the hifi codec is necessary? |
|
To me this is a no-brainer. We are an open-source project and if someone builds the interface, they essentially infringe the copyright of that codec. |
| "help": "List of codec names in order of preferred usage", | ||
| "placeholder": "opus, hifiAC, zlib, pcm", | ||
| "default": "opus,hifiAC,zlib,pcm", | ||
| "placeholder": "opus, zlib, pcm", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| "placeholder": "opus, zlib, pcm", | |
| "placeholder": "opus, zlib, pcm", |
|
Dev meeting: this is waiting on opus performance improvements |
|
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
digisomni
added
the
dormant
|
Hello! Is this still an issue? |
6 participants
This is a proprietary codec and it's uncertain who can use it, and
under what conditions. At this point, Opus is stable and a suitable
replacement.