You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 29, 2023. It is now read-only.
Repository navigation
This repository was archived by the owner on Aug 29, 2023. It is now read-only.
I updated my vtools to v3.1.2, python 3.7.6, King 2.2.4
As I see in this disussion, @gaow commented that KING is updated. But I'm getting the error exactly as mentioned in that ISSUE.
I checked the changes in KING made by @gaow through this link - it shows .txt output in step KING_41 as opposed to .ped in an older version. But my error still shows, .ped file does not exist.
I have updated my software using bioconda, so I am not sure whether it has been updated there or not. Can that be causing this error?
Meanwhile, the issue with EXPORT command remain the same in my latest version. Could you please help with it? (I tried exporting to .tped as well without any luck)
Genotypes stored in 1 words for each of 26 individuals.
The number of individuals is < 1.
so the previous command plink --make-bed could be doing something wrong.
I would suggest that @enigmargs tries to understand what ~/.variant_tools/pipeline/KING.pipeline is trying to achieve and see if this is what is supposed to happen given this particular dataset.
different (larger) dataset - which shows the same error as you quoted
King v2.2.3 which shows the following
and king v2.2.2 which shows error as below, I think in line with the WARNING mentioned in KING website that LPACK libraries are lacking below v2.2.3
Is there any specific reason to use tfile format in export (instead of vcf) at King_20?
Is it advisable to calculate PCs using PLINK and then import as phenotype field directly?
I sincerely hope that I'm not dragging it too long!
@enigmargs This pipeline not only does PCA but also does relationship analysis which is important in GWAS. Compared to PLINK, the relationship analysis using KING is more robust to the presence of population structure, and can perform pair-wise comparisons between individuals thus works for small sample size where good estimate of allele frequency is challenging.
Perhaps for PCA/MDS analysis there is no major difference between these tools. Unfortunately we don't have a separate implementation for that.
It seems the failure is related to LAPACK installation?
Activity
BoPeng commentedon May 16, 2020
I have trouble installing plink because the bioconda plink uses a version of gsl that conflicts with the conda-forge version of gsl used by vtools.
BoPeng commentedon May 16, 2020
So the problem seems to be with the version of
king.BoPeng commentedon May 16, 2020
Error message is
so the previous command
plink --make-bedcould be doing something wrong.I would suggest that @enigmargs tries to understand what
~/.variant_tools/pipeline/KING.pipelineis trying to achieve and see if this is what is supposed to happen given this particular dataset.enigmargs commentedon May 22, 2020
I tried exececuting steps individually on,
Is there any specific reason to use
tfileformat in export (instead of vcf) at King_20?Is it advisable to calculate PCs using PLINK and then import as phenotype field directly?
I sincerely hope that I'm not dragging it too long!
gaow commentedon May 22, 2020
@enigmargs This pipeline not only does PCA but also does relationship analysis which is important in GWAS. Compared to PLINK, the relationship analysis using KING is more robust to the presence of population structure, and can perform pair-wise comparisons between individuals thus works for small sample size where good estimate of allele frequency is challenging.
Perhaps for PCA/MDS analysis there is no major difference between these tools. Unfortunately we don't have a separate implementation for that.
It seems the failure is related to LAPACK installation?