Improve README accuracy and links#18
Conversation
|
👋 Hello @glenn-jocher, thank you for submitting a
For more guidance, please refer to our Contributing Guide. Don’t hesitate to leave a comment if you have any questions. Thank you for contributing to Ultralytics! 🚀 |
UltralyticsAssistant
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🔍 PR Review
Made with ❤️ by Ultralytics Actions
Documentation-only PR looks clean. The updated README guidance matches the current repository layout and removes the incorrect MkDocs/contributors references without introducing any actionable issues in the diff. (github.com)
|
Merged! 🎉 Thanks, @glenn-jocher, for sharpening the As Leonardo da Vinci said, “Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.” This PR reflects that well by removing outdated guidance, pointing users to the actual Really appreciate the thoughtful cleanup, clearer configuration instructions, and the small but important link fixes that improve the overall contributor experience. |
Summary
Validation
🛠️ PR Summary
Made with ❤️ by Ultralytics Actions
🌟 Summary
This PR simplifies and corrects the
source-tracedocumentation so users can quickly configure repository comparisons and run the tool directly 🚀📊 Key Changes
README.mdsetup steps to point users to the real workflow insource/run_repo.pyinstead of genericdocs/guidance.SOURCE_REPODEST_REPOSUFFIXESsource/run_repo.pypython source/run_repo.pydocs/README.mdto reflect the current state of the project:mkdocs.ymlREADME.mdso it now points to the correctultralytics/source-tracecontributors page 🔗🎯 Purpose & Impact