Skip to content

leetcode/693: bit operations#378

Merged
tony84727 merged 2 commits intomainfrom
leetcode/693
Feb 18, 2026
Merged

leetcode/693: bit operations#378
tony84727 merged 2 commits intomainfrom
leetcode/693

Conversation

@tony84727
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

No description provided.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @tony84727, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces a new solution for LeetCode problem 693, which checks if a binary number has alternating bits. The implementation utilizes bit manipulation techniques for an optimized approach and includes a dedicated module with tests, ensuring its correctness and proper integration into the existing LeetCode problem set.

Highlights

  • New LeetCode Problem Solution: A solution for LeetCode problem 693, 'Binary Number with Alternating Bits', has been added. This includes the core logic and comprehensive test cases.
  • Bitwise Operations: The implemented solution leverages bitwise operations to efficiently determine if a given integer has alternating bits.
  • Module Integration: The new solution module has been integrated into the main src/leetcode/mod.rs file, making it accessible within the project structure.
Changelog
  • src/leetcode/algorithm_693/README.md
    • Added a new README file providing the problem title and a link to the LeetCode problem.
  • src/leetcode/algorithm_693/mod.rs
    • Implemented the has_alternating_bits function using bitwise operations.
    • Included a comprehensive set of unit tests using test_case to validate the solution's correctness.
  • src/leetcode/mod.rs
    • Added a new public module declaration for algorithm_693 to integrate the new solution into the LeetCode collection.
Activity
  • No specific activity (comments, reviews, or progress updates) has been recorded for this pull request yet.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds a solution for LeetCode problem 693, "Binary Number with Alternating Bits". The implementation uses bitwise operations to check for alternating bits. While the approach is clever, it's a bit complex and the logic for calculating the number of bits for the mask is flawed, especially for inputs that are powers of two. I've suggested a more idiomatic, simpler, and robust solution that also uses bit manipulation but is easier to understand and verify for correctness.

Co-authored-by: gemini-code-assist[bot] <176961590+gemini-code-assist[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
@tony84727 tony84727 merged commit a497a07 into main Feb 18, 2026
4 checks passed
@tony84727 tony84727 deleted the leetcode/693 branch February 18, 2026 16:40
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant