-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
fix: warn on implicit zero-fill and preserve empty dicts in Batch #1296
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
Lidang-Jiang
wants to merge
5
commits into
thu-ml:master
Choose a base branch
from
Lidang-Jiang:fix/batch-none-and-empty-handling
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
ddce36a
fix: warn on implicit zero-fill and preserve empty dicts in Batch
Lidang-Jiang 9ebf7df
style: apply ruff format and add CHANGELOG entry
Lidang-Jiang a60ca51
fix: resolve mypy unreachable/unused-ignore errors in batch.py
Lidang-Jiang 0e42d04
fix(batch): rename variable to avoid mypy unreachable-code false posi…
Lidang-Jiang 0953587
fix(batch): handle differing nested keys in partial-key stacking
Lidang-Jiang File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Keeping top-level empty dicts as
Batch()placeholders causes mixed nested schemas to fail in cases that previously worked. For example,Batch.stack([{"info": {"a": 1}}, {}, {"info": {"b": 2}}])now routesinfothrough the partial-key assignment path; the first value allocates only subkeya, and assigning the third value then raisesValueError("Creating keys is not supported by item assignment.")when subkeybappears. This breaks stacking whenever an empty entry sits between batches whose nested keys differ.Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good catch. When empty dicts are preserved between batches whose nested keys differ, the element-by-element assignment path fails because
__setitem__doesn't support creating new keys.Fixed in 0953587: for partial keys containing nested Batch/dict values, we now collect all entries and delegate to recursive
Batch.stackinstead of assigning one-by-one. This handles differing nested schemas correctly.Verified locally: