feat: graceful degradation#334
Open
fluffypony wants to merge 2 commits into
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR implements a complete graceful degradation system for the P2P networking module that automatically adapts network behavior under various load conditions to ensure system stability and optimal resource utilization.
Key Features Implemented:
🔄 Adaptive Resource Management
📊 Real-time Health Monitoring
⚡ Performance Optimization
Motivation and Context
The P2Pool network module previously operated with fixed resource limits and static behavior regardless of system load or network conditions. This could lead to:
The graceful degradation system addresses these issues by implementing three pressure levels (Normal, Medium, High) that automatically trigger appropriate responses:
How Has This Been Tested?
✅ Compilation Verification
cargo build --release✅ Implementation Verification
✅ Feature Coverage
What process can a PR reviewer use to test or verify this change?
🔍 Code Review Checklist
Verify Core Implementation:
Build Verification:
Review Key Components:
P2PHealthTrackerstruct: Verify all error tracking fields and pressure assessment logicperform_health_check(): Review semaphore pressure calculation and adaptive responsessync_missing_blocks(): Check adaptive sync limit applicationhandle_new_gossipsub_message(): Verify message filtering under high pressure🧪 Runtime Testing Suggestions
Breaking Changes