Skip to content

docs(postcss): add missing node:path import in base option example#20014

Closed
pavan-sh wants to merge 2 commits intotailwindlabs:mainfrom
pavan-sh:fix/postcss-readme-path-import
Closed

docs(postcss): add missing node:path import in base option example#20014
pavan-sh wants to merge 2 commits intotailwindlabs:mainfrom
pavan-sh:fix/postcss-readme-path-import

Conversation

@pavan-sh
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@pavan-sh pavan-sh commented May 6, 2026

Summary

Adds missing import path from 'node:path' to the PostCSS README base option example so the snippet is copy-paste runnable and doesn’t reference an undefined path

Test plan

Check README snippet includes import path from 'node:path' before path.resolve(...).

@pavan-sh pavan-sh requested a review from a team as a code owner May 6, 2026 03:48
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented May 6, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 142ac904-e81b-435c-9eaf-01bd45033acf

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0b3baa0 and 4e6b28d.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/@tailwindcss-postcss/README.md

Walkthrough

The README for the @tailwindcss-postcss package was updated to make the example ES module-compatible. The changes add import { fileURLToPath } from 'node:url', import path from 'node:path', and const __dirname = path.dirname(fileURLToPath(import.meta.url)), and update the example to use path.resolve(__dirname, './path'). No public API changes were made.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 4
✅ Passed checks (4 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title accurately describes the main change: adding missing node:path import to the PostCSS README example code snippet to make it functional.
Description check ✅ Passed The description clearly relates to the changeset, explaining the problem (missing import) and solution (adding the import) to make the code example copy-paste runnable.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

Tip

💬 Introducing Slack Agent: The best way for teams to turn conversations into code.

Slack Agent is built on CodeRabbit's deep understanding of your code, so your team can collaborate across the entire SDLC without losing context.

  • Generate code and open pull requests
  • Plan features and break down work
  • Investigate incidents and troubleshoot customer tickets together
  • Automate recurring tasks and respond to alerts with triggers
  • Summarize progress and report instantly

Built for teams:

  • Shared memory across your entire org—no repeating context
  • Per-thread sandboxes to safely plan and execute work
  • Governance built-in—scoped access, auditability, and budget controls

One agent for your entire SDLC. Right inside Slack.

👉 Get started


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@greptile-apps
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

greptile-apps Bot commented May 6, 2026

Confidence Score: 5/5

Single-file documentation fix that makes a broken code snippet copy-paste runnable; no runtime code is touched.

The change is limited to adding three lines to a README example. The added imports and __dirname derivation are correct for ESM and directly fix the undefined references in the snippet. No logic, configuration, or runtime behaviour is affected.

No files require special attention.

Reviews (2): Last reviewed commit: "docs(postcss): make base option example ..." | Re-trigger Greptile

@RobinMalfait
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Hey! Appreciate it, but without this it's also valid, but of course it all depends on the environment. In some spots it's necessary, in others it is not, in others you have to use process.cwd() instead of __dirname.

Going to close it just to keep things simple for now. Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants