Skip to content

Conversation

Edison-A-N
Copy link

Describe your changes

add stateless http transport support

Issue ticket number and link (if applicable)

#209

Screenshots of the feature / bugfix

Checklist before requesting a review

  • Added relevant tests
  • Run ruff & mypy
  • All tests pass

@Edison-A-N Edison-A-N force-pushed the feature/stateless-flag branch from 7abea08 to b891c21 Compare August 15, 2025 08:10
@buhaiqing
Copy link

I hope this feature can be officially released as soon as possible

@frouzbeh
Copy link

Hi, Is this pr complete? I am trying to use langchain mcp-adapter client, and it seems it only supports stateless streamable_http.

@Edison-A-N
Copy link
Author

Hi @frouzbeh

You can test the changes in either branch—both are already rebased on the latest main:

Both branches contain the feature proposed in this PR.

@jakegt1
Copy link

jakegt1 commented Aug 27, 2025

this really would be great to have merged as atm you simply cannot use this with gunicorn at all.

@Edison-A-N
Copy link
Author

You're right — as I mentioned in this comment, the current implementation breaks under Gunicorn with multi workers.

@brendanshanahan
Copy link

You're right — as I mentioned in this comment, the current implementation breaks under Gunicorn with multi workers.

it would be great to get this merged. i'm hitting the same wall with a multi-worker gunicorn application and switching it to single-worker is not an option

@jakegt1
Copy link

jakegt1 commented Sep 2, 2025

@itay-tadata sorry for the ping here, but this just seems a really useful feature for the project. Do you mind taking a look if you have the time?

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 2, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@Derican
Copy link

Derican commented Oct 11, 2025

I noticed that this PR contains a feature that would be very helpful for my work. May I kindly ask if there is an estimated timeline for when it might be merged into the main release?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants