Skip to content

Conversation

@jovial
Copy link
Contributor

@jovial jovial commented Jul 29, 2025

Policy override was causing lots of error messages in the Ironic view of Horizon.

I've asked upstream if we can get this enabled by default:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/2102214

But are yet to see any traction.

Policy override was causing lots of error messages in the Ironic view of
Horizon.

I've asked upstream if we can get this enabled by default:

https://bugs.launchpad.net/horizon/+bug/2102214

But are yet to see any traction.
# Intended scope(s): system, project
# Overridden: added role:admin
"baremetal:node:list_all": "role:admin or (role:reader and system_scope:all) or (role:service and system_scope:all) or rule:service_role"
"baremetal:node:list_all": "role:baremetal_node_list_all or (role:reader and system_scope:all) or (role:service and system_scope:all) or rule:service_role"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

does it mean that regular admin users now won't be able to list all baremetals from cli? - I think that was idea behind this policy override. also baremetal_node_list_all don't exist by default?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@jovial jovial Aug 18, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

baremetal_node_list_all don't exist by default?

Correct, you'd have to create that.

does it mean that regular admin users now won't be able to list all baremetals from cli?

Correct, unless they own all nodes (via setting the owner property on baremetal nodes). You can add the new role if you need that behaviour (but it will break your horizon).

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will this break Horizon, even with SYSTEM_SCOPE_SERVICES = ['ironic'] set?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@jovial jovial Sep 12, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, as I think system scope appears in the project drop down. So if you have a project selected (rather than system scope) and you navigate to the baremetal provisioning section, you will get a bunch of errors. You would be able to select system scope and browse to the same page though.

Copy link
Member

@JohnGarbutt JohnGarbutt Sep 26, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bbezak what I think we should do is make sure the nodes are all added into a single project, e.g. admin project, so the regular project scoped admin user can still list them all, and do all the usual actions to the nodes that worked in yoga, etc.

In my head, this extra role here is only needed to help in the Slurm case, where some other member in some other project, needs to list all baremetal nodes, to convert the baremetal node name into a uuid, to pass into the scheduler hint.

---
upgrade:
- |
Users with the admin role can can no longer list all baremetal nodes by
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: 'can' was written twice

default. This broke horizon as it tries to collect data for any nodes
that it can see. Please add the baremetal_node_list_all role
to any users to want this capability; it is not recommened since
Horizon will remain broken for them.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't think that will break Horizon, right, as the member + baremetal_node_list_all user will not have the ironic tab appear in horizon, anyways.

The only remaining broken combination would be having the admin role, in a project other than the project that owns all the ironic nodes. I guess? Which I suppose you fix by adding the system scope thing?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants