Skip to content

Bump chainlink-starknet plugin to Starknet 0.14.3 (develop) - #22849

Merged
MStreet3 merged 6 commits into
developfrom
feature/bump-starknet-plugin-0.14
Jun 16, 2026
Merged

Bump chainlink-starknet plugin to Starknet 0.14.3 (develop)#22849
MStreet3 merged 6 commits into
developfrom
feature/bump-starknet-plugin-0.14

Conversation

@cawthorne

@cawthorne cawthorne commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

Bump the Starknet LOOPP plugin pin in plugins/plugins.public.yaml to the merged chainlink-starknet #695 develop commit (5d83a289).

Brings chainlink develop up to Starknet 0.14.3 readiness:

  • starknet.go v0.17.1 / juno v0.15.11
  • devnet-rs 0.8.2 (RPC 0.10.x)
  • chainlink-common #2154 keystore (starknet.go v0.17 starkkey)
  • LatestHead single latest-tag fetch (HeadReporter RPC code 24 fix)

Scope: plugin manifest only — no go.mod changes. Keystore comes from chainlink-starknet deps; a direct core go.mod keystore replace was reverted earlier (pulled tablewriter v1 and broke builds).

Test plan

  • chainlink-starknet #695 merged to develop
  • Docker Build workflow passes
  • Staging HeadReporter no longer logs RPC code 24 on SN_SEPOLIA (with published image or post-merge build)
  • chainlink-starknet TestOCRBasic smoke green on develop

Pin starknet LOOPP to chainlink-starknet #695 (starknet.go v0.17.1) and temporarily replace chainlink-common/keystore with #2154 for OCR2 signing compatibility.
@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

👋 cawthorne, thanks for creating this pull request!

To help reviewers, please consider creating future PRs as drafts first. This allows you to self-review and make any final changes before notifying the team.

Once you're ready, you can mark it as "Ready for review" to request feedback. Thanks!

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jun 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✅ No conflicts with other open PRs targeting develop

The keystore replace and go mod tidy pulled tablewriter v1.0.9, which
breaks chainlink-ccv compilation and fails dependency validation for
the unreleased chainlink-common/keystore commit.
@trunk-io

trunk-io Bot commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Static BadgeStatic BadgeStatic BadgeStatic Badge

View Full Report ↗︎Docs

@cawthorne cawthorne added the build-publish Build and Publish image to SDLC label Jun 16, 2026
@cawthorne
cawthorne marked this pull request as ready for review June 16, 2026 00:32
@cawthorne
cawthorne marked this pull request as draft June 16, 2026 00:33
@cawthorne
cawthorne marked this pull request as ready for review June 16, 2026 00:33
@cawthorne
cawthorne marked this pull request as draft June 16, 2026 00:35
Point gitRef at cc5d106b (LatestHead block-by-number fix).
Pick up LatestHead single latest-tag fetch fix (0b0430d6) for HeadReporter
RPC code 24 on Sepolia staging.
Point plugins.public.yaml at develop merge commit 5d83a289 after
chainlink-starknet #695 (Starknet 0.14.3 / starknet.go v0.17.1) landed.
@cawthorne
cawthorne marked this pull request as ready for review June 16, 2026 19:07
@cawthorne cawthorne changed the title Bump chainlink-starknet plugin for Starknet 0.14.3 smoke builds Bump chainlink-starknet plugin to Starknet 0.14.3 (develop) Jun 16, 2026
@MStreet3
MStreet3 enabled auto-merge June 16, 2026 19:12
@cl-sonarqube-production

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@MStreet3
MStreet3 added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 16, 2026
Merged via the queue into develop with commit 576eb9c Jun 16, 2026
142 checks passed
@MStreet3
MStreet3 deleted the feature/bump-starknet-plugin-0.14 branch June 16, 2026 19:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

build-publish Build and Publish image to SDLC

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants