ci: improve coverage

[wellwelwel]

Resolve the minor points in #4178 (review) related to tests.

cc @logaretm

[logaretm]

Looks good, didn't know it/describe could be awaited 😆

[wellwelwel]

Looks good, didn't know it/describe could be awaited 😆

Thanks, @logaretm! This is a characteristic behavior of Poku, which tests exactly how to write code in natural JavaScript. This is also one of the key reasons why it is possible to run the same test suite across all runtimes with consistent results and behaviors 🙋🏻‍♂️

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 90.60%. Comparing base (c06afc2) to head (57a5de6).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4181      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   90.32%   90.60%   +0.28%     
==========================================
  Files          87       87              
  Lines       14280    14280              
  Branches     1788     1798      +10     
==========================================
+ Hits        12898    12938      +40     
+ Misses       1382     1342      -40     

Flag	Coverage Δ
compression-0	89.85% <ø> (+0.28%)	⬆️
compression-1	90.58% <ø> (+0.28%)	⬆️
static-parser-0	88.29% <ø> (+0.28%)	⬆️
static-parser-1	89.01% <ø> (+0.28%)	⬆️
tls-0	90.03% <ø> (+0.28%)	⬆️
tls-1	90.38% <ø> (+0.28%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.