Skip to content

Conversation

@YooSunYoung
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

facility="ess", neutrons=neutrons, pulses=2, seed=seed, wmax=wmax, wmin=wmin
facility="ess",
neutrons=neutrons,
pulses=1, # NMX does not use pulse-skipping.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is not necessarily only for pulse-skipping instruments. It can also be used to look at potential time overlap between successive pulses. As long as you are sure that there is no overlap, you can leave it as 1.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm yeah Aaron said there shouldn't be any overlaps but when we give some margin of l-total to the lookup table, it shows some overlap. I'll update it to 2.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess I meant that we could update/remove the comment.
I think setting as 1 is fine (and it's also cheaper in compute, as it makes N neutrons per pulse).

@YooSunYoung YooSunYoung requested a review from nvaytet December 10, 2025 08:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

Status: In progress

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants