Skip to content

Conversation

@gselzer
Copy link
Member

@gselzer gselzer commented Jun 24, 2021

This PR is a port of imagej/imagej-ops#533, thanks to @bnorthan for the initial work.

Note that in an ideal world we would be able to port the optionality of the later parameters of this Op, however that functionality does not quite exist. The functionality should be added once #32 is merged.

@gselzer gselzer force-pushed the imagej/imagej-ops2/real-transform branch 2 times, most recently from baf869e to 8116bac Compare July 14, 2023 19:11
@gselzer gselzer force-pushed the imagej/imagej-ops2/real-transform branch from 8116bac to 8be030c Compare July 14, 2023 20:14
@gselzer
Copy link
Member Author

gselzer commented Jul 14, 2023

@ctrueden @hinerm I updated this PR based on the advancements we've made to the project over...the last couple years 😅.

I think it's ready for merge, unless we're concerned about the test resources added - I think it's difficult to do a mathematical regression test, though, due to the rounding all over the place, and the resources are pretty small, so I'm not too concerned.

Copy link
Member

@ctrueden ctrueden left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @gselzer! The binary test resources are no problem, as they are lightweight.

@ctrueden ctrueden merged commit 106b628 into main Jul 15, 2023
@ctrueden ctrueden deleted the imagej/imagej-ops2/real-transform branch July 15, 2023 14:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants