Skip to content

Conversation

@robertatakenaka
Copy link
Member

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to fix 2 vulnerabilities in the pip dependencies of this project.

Snyk changed the following file(s):

  • requirements/local.txt
⚠️ Warning
django-extensions 3.2.3 requires Django, which is not installed.

Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • Max score is 1000. Note that the real score may have changed since the PR was raised.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.
  • Some vulnerabilities couldn't be fully fixed and so Snyk will still find them when the project is tested again. This may be because the vulnerability existed within more than one direct dependency, but not all of the affected dependencies could be upgraded.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open fix PRs.

For more information:
🧐 View latest project report
📜 Customise PR templates
🛠 Adjust project settings
📚 Read about Snyk's upgrade logic


Learn how to fix vulnerabilities with free interactive lessons:

🦉 SQL Injection

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings November 8, 2025 07:24
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR upgrades Django from version 3.2.25 to 4.2.26 to address two security vulnerabilities (SNYK-PYTHON-DJANGO-13836728 and SNYK-PYTHON-DJANGO-13837025) identified by Snyk. This is a major version upgrade that fixes SQL injection and other security issues.

  • Upgrades Django from 3.2.25 (LTS) to 4.2.26 (LTS) to patch security vulnerabilities
  • Adds a Snyk-pinned Django dependency constraint to local requirements

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

django-coverage-plugin==3.1.0 # https://github.com/nedbat/django_coverage_plugin
pytest-django==4.7.0 # https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-django
tornado>=6.4.1 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability
django>=4.2.26 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability
Copy link

Copilot AI Nov 8, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Adding django>=4.2.26 to local.txt creates a dependency conflict. Django 3.2.x is likely pinned in a base requirements file (e.g., base.txt or production.txt), but this adds a conflicting constraint requiring 4.2.26+. This is a major version upgrade (3.2→4.2) that requires updating the primary Django dependency declaration and testing for breaking changes, not just adding a constraint in local.txt. The PR should update the main Django requirement instead of adding a duplicate constraint.

Suggested change
django>=4.2.26 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
django-coverage-plugin==3.1.0 # https://github.com/nedbat/django_coverage_plugin
pytest-django==4.7.0 # https://github.com/pytest-dev/pytest-django
tornado>=6.4.1 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability
django>=4.2.26 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability
Copy link

Copilot AI Nov 8, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The comment 'not directly required' is misleading since Django is clearly a direct dependency of this project (as indicated by django-extensions requiring it). The comment should accurately reflect that this is upgrading an existing Django dependency for security reasons.

Suggested change
django>=4.2.26 # not directly required, pinned by Snyk to avoid a vulnerability
django>=4.2.26 # direct dependency; version pinned/upgraded for security reasons

Copilot uses AI. Check for mistakes.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants