feature: Added ability to create requirements.txt in create_requirements_json function

[sababak]

Add requirements.txt generation support

Summary: Adds optional create_requirements_txt parameter to create_requirements_json() function for SAS Event Stream Processing compatibility.

Changes:

New create_requirements_txt: bool = False parameter (backward compatible)
Generates standard pip requirements.txt format (package==version)
Creates file in same output path as requirements.json
Updated docstring documentation

Usage:
JSONFiles.create_requirements_json(
output_path="./output",
create_requirements_txt=True
)

Fixes: EDMMMX-13491

[sababak]

Could the addition of this import to install mapping create some issues with backwards compatibility? I noticed that in the example files it directs users to manually change the import names for packages like sklearn.

[smlindauer]

No, I think we're good here, since it was a non-programmatic ask. If they go hunting to change something and find it's fixed, I doubt we'll get complaints.

[review-notebook-app]

Check out this pull request on 

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.

---

Powered by ReviewNB

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 87.50000% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 64.26%. Comparing base (ef47a70) to head (973fa82).
⚠️ Report is 12 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/sasctl/pzmm/write_json_files.py	87.50%	2 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #222      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   64.17%   64.26%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files          57       57              
  Lines        6230     6286      +56     
==========================================
+ Hits         3998     4040      +42     
- Misses       2232     2246      +14     

Flag	Coverage Δ
integration	64.26% <87.50%> (+0.09%)	⬆️
unit	64.26% <87.50%> (+0.09%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[smlindauer]

No, I think we're good here, since it was a non-programmatic ask. If they go hunting to change something and find it's fixed, I doubt we'll get complaints.