Skip to content

Conversation

@Kivooeo
Copy link
Member

@Kivooeo Kivooeo commented Dec 20, 2025

Successful merges:

r? @ghost
@rustbot modify labels: rollup

Create a similar rollup

tisonkun and others added 16 commits December 9, 2025 20:38
Expect the entire input to be a single XML document, instead of
reading it line by line. This detects trailing junk better.
Copied validate_junit.py from libtest-junit.

JUnit format works well in edition 2021, but is currently broken
in edition 2024 by the mergeable doctest report.
Fix the panic in write_message() which expects messages to contain
no embedded newlines. We still want a trailing newline at the end
of the file though, so write it in different manner.

Doctest runner no longer panics, but the output is kinda broken
when `compile_fail` doctests are present. This is because they
are not mergeable.
stage1's rustdoc is using stage0's libtest which does not have
a fix from 069cf9d, making the test run fail. Ensure that
this test is executed with everything recompiled in stage2.
This was accidentally added to the prelude in
3f4dc1e.
Fix trailing newline in JUnit formatter

`write_message()` expects messages to contain no newlines.

Fixes rust-lang#149436
…=Mark-Simulacrum

Add const default for OnceCell and OnceLock

cc rust-lang#143894
fix docustring on fetch_or

The documentation had the same example twice in a row, but I think this was the intended second example.
change non-canonical clone impl to {*self}, fix some doc comments
…om-prelude, r=jdonszelmann

Drop the From derive macro from the v1 prelude

This was accidentally added to the prelude in 3f4dc1e.

Fixes: rust-lang#150165

r? `@jdonszelmann`
@rustbot rustbot added A-run-make Area: port run-make Makefiles to rmake.rs S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. rollup A PR which is a rollup labels Dec 20, 2025
@Kivooeo
Copy link
Member Author

Kivooeo commented Dec 20, 2025

@bors r+ rollup=never p=5

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 20, 2025

📌 Commit 41be962 has been approved by Kivooeo

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 20, 2025
@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 21, 2025

⌛ Testing commit 41be962 with merge 10d7620...

bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2025
Rollup of 6 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #149437 (Fix trailing newline in JUnit formatter)
 - #149812 (Add const default for OnceCell and OnceLock)
 - #150035 (fix docustring on fetch_or)
 - #150160 (Fix ICE (#149980) for invalid EII in statement position)
 - #150191 (change non-canonical clone impl to {*self}, fix some doc comments)
 - #150203 (Drop the From derive macro from the v1 prelude)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@rust-log-analyzer
Copy link
Collaborator

The job dist-i686-mingw failed! Check out the build log: (web) (plain enhanced) (plain)

Click to see the possible cause of the failure (guessed by this bot)
[RUSTC-TIMING] cfg_if test:false 0.753
error: could not compile `cfg-if` (lib)

Caused by:
  process didn't exit successfully: `D:\a\rust\rust\build\bootstrap\debug\rustc D:\a\rust\rust\build\bootstrap\debug\rustc --crate-name cfg_if --edition=2018 C:\Users\runneradmin\.cargo\registry\src\index.crates.io-1949cf8c6b5b557f\cfg-if-1.0.4\src\lib.rs --error-format=json --json=diagnostic-rendered-ansi,artifacts,future-incompat --crate-type lib --emit=dep-info,metadata,link -C opt-level=3 -C embed-bitcode=no -C codegen-units=1 -C debuginfo=1 --cfg "feature=\"core\"" --cfg "feature=\"rustc-dep-of-std\"" --check-cfg cfg(docsrs,test) --check-cfg "cfg(feature, values(\"core\", \"rustc-dep-of-std\"))" -C metadata=45edb51d6823378e -C extra-filename=-5c2d9b2010aef221 --out-dir D:\a\rust\rust\build\i686-pc-windows-gnu\stage1-std\i686-pc-windows-gnu\release\deps --target i686-pc-windows-gnu -L dependency=D:\a\rust\rust\build\i686-pc-windows-gnu\stage1-std\i686-pc-windows-gnu\release\deps -L dependency=D:\a\rust\rust\build\i686-pc-windows-gnu\stage1-std\release\deps --extern core=D:\a\rust\rust\build\i686-pc-windows-gnu\stage1-std\i686-pc-windows-gnu\release\deps\librustc_std_workspace_core-66fc7e29ee8147d1.rmeta --cap-lints allow -Csymbol-mangling-version=v0 -Zannotate-moves --check-cfg=cfg(feature,values(any())) -Zunstable-options -Zmacro-backtrace -Csplit-debuginfo=packed -Cprefer-dynamic -Zinline-mir -Zinline-mir-preserve-debug -Zmir_strip_debuginfo=locals-in-tiny-functions -Alinker-messages -Cembed-bitcode=yes -Zunstable-options -Cforce-frame-pointers=non-leaf "-Zcrate-attr=doc(html_root_url=\"https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/\")" -Z binary-dep-depinfo -L native=D:\a\rust\rust\build\i686-pc-windows-gnu\stage1-std\i686-pc-windows-gnu\release\build\compiler_builtins-5d78aa92524c1210\out` (exit code: 0xc0000005, STATUS_ACCESS_VIOLATION)
warning: build failed, waiting for other jobs to finish...
[RUSTC-TIMING] core test:false 32.287
[RUSTC-TIMING] compiler_builtins test:false 7.773
[RUSTC-TIMING] alloc test:false 7.239
Bootstrap failed while executing `dist bootstrap --include-default-paths`

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 21, 2025

💔 Test failed - checks-actions

@bors bors removed the S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. label Dec 21, 2025
@bors bors added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Dec 21, 2025
@Kivooeo
Copy link
Member Author

Kivooeo commented Dec 21, 2025

@bors r-

@Kivooeo Kivooeo closed this Dec 21, 2025
@bors bors added S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 21, 2025
@rustbot rustbot removed the S-waiting-on-author Status: This is awaiting some action (such as code changes or more information) from the author. label Dec 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-run-make Area: port run-make Makefiles to rmake.rs rollup A PR which is a rollup T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants