Skip to content

metaMDBG#228

Draft
wwood wants to merge 1 commit into
devfrom
metamdbg
Draft

metaMDBG#228
wwood wants to merge 1 commit into
devfrom
metamdbg

Conversation

@wwood

@wwood wwood commented Nov 20, 2024

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

An alternative to flye. To do / decide:

  • Do the contigs need polishing etc afterwards?
  • Is qc beforehand worth doing?
  • How well does it scale on a resources perspective?
  • This is the first alternative to flye - how do we present the choice to the user?
  • Disallow poorer quality read input i.e. ont, and other longread types not currently supported by metaMDBG

The paper suggests some qc options (ratatosk for hybrid, VeChat for long-read-only), but in a complicated way, the qc procedures might be different for hifi compared to ONT.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant