[3860][UPD] dotfiles

[AungKoKoLin1997]

3860
4733

[yostashiro]

Thanks, @AungKoKoLin1997 ! Can you please take this chance to fix tests as well?

[AungKoKoLin1997]

I have no idea why purchase_received_qty_adj is failed in run tests stage, not in db initialize. I tried to install this module in dev environment and can install. There is no xml error.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (10.0@7305226). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

❗ Current head 4363ae6 differs from pull request most recent head 86394a8. Consider uploading reports for the commit 86394a8 to get more accurate results

📣 This organization is not using Codecov’s GitHub App Integration. We recommend you install it so Codecov can continue to function properly for your repositories. Learn more

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             10.0     #218   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage        ?   53.10%           
=======================================
  Files           ?      230           
  Lines           ?     3188           
  Branches        ?      567           
=======================================
  Hits            ?     1693           
  Misses          ?     1408           
  Partials        ?       87           

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

[AungKoKoLin1997]

There is only one issue to fix the tests and it's tricky to fix it. So, I think I spend time on this task is enough and will follow up with another task later.

[AungKoKoLin1997]

Tests CI is failed because of stock_shipment_schedule_report depends on website_product_stock that is hosted in pci-private. So, I will follow up for this case because this is not within the scope of this PR.

[yostashiro]

Tests CI is failed because of stock_shipment_schedule_report depends on website_product_stock that is hosted in pci-private. So, I will follow up for this case because this is not within the scope of this PR.

I'm checking with the client whether stock_shipment_schedule_report is still in use. If it is not, then we can simply put it in the deprecated folder. Otherwise, we want to remove the dependency on website_product_stock from stock_shipment_schedule_report first by creating a bridge module in the pci-private repo. I think it should be relatively simple (I believe the only part that depends on website_product_stock is where consider_qty field appears, if I'm not mistaken).

https://github.com/qrtl/pci-custom/blob/1f17fda/stock_shipment_schedule_report/reports/shipment_schedule_report_compute.py#L181

[AungKoKoLin1997]

I checked the tests CI failed and it is strange that purchase_received_qty_adj can't be installed because of view problem.
But can install in the dev environment.

[AungKoKoLin1997]

I checked the tests CI failed and it is strange that purchase_received_qty_adj can't be installed because of view problem. But can install in the dev environment.

I tried multiple ways and I don't know the reason. I will follow up on this later with another PR.