Skip to content

Conversation

@xmas92
Copy link
Member

@xmas92 xmas92 commented Dec 1, 2025

JDK-8370943 added the ability to expand the heap for Serial and Parallel without having to GC during early startup (before is_init_completed). The expansion code was written with the assumption that it is performed in a safepoint.

We have currently observed one crash related to the fact that top is updated before we setup the card table. But we can also see that the synchronisation between expansion and allocation is not correct.

I propose that we create a critical section for the early expansion and any early allocation.

We might want to relax this critical section in the future, after we have fixed the expansion code and allocation interactions. But for now it seems safer to simply use a mutex.

We also looked at using a RW style lock, but deemed it a bit unnecessary (master...xmas92:jdk:pre-init-expansion-rw-lock). Any potential performance gain may be better achieved by simply resolving the synchronisation issues with expansion.

  • Testing
    • GHA
    • Tier 1-3 on Oracle supported platforms
    • Stress-tested with reproducer while java -XX:-UseCompressedOops -XX:+UseSerialGC -XX:InitialHeapSize=1m -Xmx1002M -version; do date;

Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

  • JDK-8372540: SerialGC: Remove race between allocation and expansion before is_init_completed (Bug - P4)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28573/head:pull/28573
$ git checkout pull/28573

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/28573
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28573/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 28573

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 28573

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28573.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Dec 1, 2025

👋 Welcome back aboldtch! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 1, 2025

@xmas92 This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8372540: SerialGC: Remove race between allocation and expansion before is_init_completed

Reviewed-by: ayang, sjohanss, eosterlund

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 6 new commits pushed to the master branch:

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 1, 2025

@xmas92 The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • hotspot-gc

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Dec 1, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Dec 1, 2025

Webrevs

@openjdk openjdk bot added the ready Pull request is ready to be integrated label Dec 1, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@fisk fisk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@xmas92
Copy link
Member Author

xmas92 commented Dec 2, 2025

Thanks for the reviews.
/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 2, 2025

Going to push as commit e27abe8.
Since your change was applied there have been 13 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Dec 2, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Dec 2, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Dec 2, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Dec 2, 2025

@xmas92 Pushed as commit e27abe8.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

hotspot-gc [email protected] integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants