Skip to content

Conversation

@vicente-romero-oracle
Copy link
Contributor

@vicente-romero-oracle vicente-romero-oracle commented Oct 9, 2025

Given the following test case:

import java.util.function.Supplier;
interface Main {
    interface X<T> {
        X<T> self();
    }

    static X<?> makeX() {return null;}

    static <R> X<R> create(Supplier<? extends R> supplier) {return null;}

    static X<X<?>> methodRef() {
        return create(Main::makeX).self();
    }

    static X<X<?>> lambda() {
        return create(() -> makeX()).self();
    }
}

javac reports an error for the method reference but not for the lambda. There should be no difference here (error in both cases)


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change requires CSR request JDK-8369518 to be approved

Issues

  • JDK-8369517: Compilation mismatch for equivalent lambda and method reference (Bug - P4)
  • JDK-8369518: Compilation mismatch for equivalent lambda and method reference (CSR)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27737/head:pull/27737
$ git checkout pull/27737

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/27737
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/27737/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 27737

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 27737

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/27737.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@vicente-romero-oracle
Copy link
Contributor Author

vicente-romero-oracle commented Oct 9, 2025

/csr needed

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Oct 9, 2025

👋 Welcome back vromero! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 9, 2025

@vicente-romero-oracle This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8369517: Compilation mismatch for equivalent lambda and method reference

Reviewed-by: mcimadamore

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been no new commits pushed to the master branch. If another commit should be pushed before you perform the /integrate command, your PR will be automatically rebased. If you prefer to avoid any potential automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration label Oct 9, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 9, 2025

@vicente-romero-oracle has indicated that a compatibility and specification (CSR) request is needed for this pull request.

@vicente-romero-oracle please create a CSR request for issue JDK-8369517 with the correct fix version. This pull request cannot be integrated until the CSR request is approved.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Oct 9, 2025

@vicente-romero-oracle The following label will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • compiler

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing list. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Oct 9, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Oct 9, 2025

Webrevs

static <R> X<R> create(Supplier<? extends R> supplier) {return null;}

static X<X<?>> methodRef() {
var s = (String)create(Main::makeX);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
var s = (String)create(Main::makeX);
var s = (String)create(ResultTypeNotBeingCapturedTest::makeX);

Please also update the .out output, which should be more consistent after this fix.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yep thanks I saw that too, copy paste bug :)

static <R> X<R> create(Supplier<? extends R> supplier) {return null;}

static X<X<?>> methodRef() {
var s = (String)create(ResultTypeNotBeingCapturedTest::makeX);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The original test from Tagir was slightly different -- maybe we want to use that one instead?

I think it was return create(...).self()

Copy link
Contributor

@mcimadamore mcimadamore left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The fix looks good!

@openjdk openjdk bot added ready Pull request is ready to be integrated and removed csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration labels Nov 7, 2025
@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Nov 7, 2025

@vicente-romero-oracle This pull request has been inactive for more than 4 weeks and will be automatically closed if another 4 weeks passes without any activity. To avoid this, simply issue a /touch or /keepalive command to the pull request. Feel free to ask for assistance if you need help with progressing this pull request towards integration!

@vicente-romero-oracle
Copy link
Contributor Author

/integrate

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 12, 2025

Going to push as commit e5a272a.
Since your change was applied there have been 15 commits pushed to the master branch:

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the integrated Pull request has been integrated label Nov 12, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot closed this Nov 12, 2025
@openjdk openjdk bot removed ready Pull request is ready to be integrated rfr Pull request is ready for review labels Nov 12, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Nov 12, 2025

@vicente-romero-oracle Pushed as commit e5a272a.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.

@vicente-romero-oracle vicente-romero-oracle deleted the JDK-8369517 branch November 12, 2025 14:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

compiler [email protected] integrated Pull request has been integrated

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants