Skip to content

Conversation

@HansBug
Copy link
Member

@HansBug HansBug commented Dec 23, 2022

No description provided.

@HansBug HansBug added the enhancement New feature or request label Dec 23, 2022
@HansBug HansBug self-assigned this Dec 23, 2022
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 23, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #16 (455fd13) into main (5371923) will increase coverage by 0.15%.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #16      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   97.19%   97.35%   +0.15%     
==========================================
  Files          33       37       +4     
  Lines        1607     1665      +58     
==========================================
+ Hits         1562     1621      +59     
+ Misses         45       44       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 97.35% <100.00%> (+0.15%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files Coverage Δ
treetensor/common/__init__.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
treetensor/common/constraints/__init__.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
treetensor/common/constraints/shape.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
treetensor/common/object.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
treetensor/common/trees.py 90.00% <100.00%> (+1.47%) ⬆️
treetensor/torch/__init__.py 97.61% <100.00%> (+0.11%) ⬆️
treetensor/torch/constraints/__init__.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
treetensor/torch/constraints/shape.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
treetensor/torch/size.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
treetensor/torch/tensor.py 99.37% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

@HansBug HansBug requested a review from PaParaZz1 February 13, 2023 06:56
from .shape import __all__ as _shape_all

__all__ = [
*_shape_all
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

add comments, such as some functions examples

if constraint:
return constraint.prefix
else:
return None
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

maybe we should raise RuntimeError here

assert not c1 > shape_prefix(2, 3, 3)
assert not c1 < shape_prefix(2, 3, 3)

assert not c1 >= np.ndarray
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why add this comparison, maybe we should add some explanation comments

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants