Skip to content

Conversation

@kylejuliandev
Copy link
Contributor

This PR

Updates the code such that it does not rely on any previous registration of a IFeatureClient. If you fail to specify a Provider and instruct the FeatureBuilder to introduce a policy for determining which provider to use, the code will get stuck infinitely trying to resolve IFeatureClient. For example:

var builder = WebApplication.CreateSlimBuilder(args);

builder.Services.AddOpenFeature(featureBuilder =>
{
    featureBuilder
        .AddPolicyName(policy =>
        {
            policy.DefaultNameSelector = provider =>
            {
                return null;
            };
        });
});

var app = builder.Build();

app.MapGet("/welcome", async ([FromServices] IFeatureClient featureClient) =>
{
    var welcomeMessageEnabled = await featureClient.GetBooleanValueAsync("welcome-message", false);

    if (welcomeMessageEnabled)
    {
        return TypedResults.Ok("Hello world! The welcome-message feature flag was enabled!");
    }

    return TypedResults.Ok("Hello world!");
});

app.Run();

Related Issues

Fixes #543

Notes

Follow-up Tasks

How to test

* If you add a AddPolicyName without having previously added a Provider,
  the code will get stuck trying to resolve IFeatureClient

Signed-off-by: Kyle Julian <[email protected]>
@kylejuliandev kylejuliandev requested a review from a team as a code owner October 21, 2025 20:40
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @kylejuliandev, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request resolves a critical issue in the OpenFeature .NET SDK where applications could get stuck in an infinite loop if AddPolicyName was used without a pre-registered feature provider. The fix refactors the IFeatureClient resolution logic to directly interact with the OpenFeature API, ensuring that clients are correctly obtained regardless of explicit provider registration, thereby preventing application startup failures and improving the stability of policy-based client configurations.

Highlights

  • Infinite Loop Fix: Addresses a critical bug where configuring policy-based client selection using AddPolicyName without explicitly registering an IFeatureClient provider would cause an infinite loop during service resolution.
  • Refactored Client Resolution: Introduces a new private helper method, ResolveFeatureClient, to centralize and correctly handle the resolution of IFeatureClient instances, whether default or named, directly from the OpenFeature API.
  • Improved Dependency Robustness: Enhances the robustness of the OpenFeatureBuilder by no longer relying on the prior registration of IFeatureClient instances through the service provider, preventing potential dependency resolution failures.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request correctly addresses a critical issue that could lead to an infinite loop when resolving IFeatureClient without a registered provider. The introduction of the ResolveFeatureClient method effectively breaks the circular dependency. I've included a couple of suggestions to further simplify the new code by reducing redundancy, which will improve its maintainability. Overall, this is a solid fix.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 21, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.88%. Comparing base (29e1657) to head (774be8e).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #606      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.76%   89.88%   +0.11%     
==========================================
  Files          77       77              
  Lines        3166     3172       +6     
  Branches      364      364              
==========================================
+ Hits         2842     2851       +9     
+ Misses        253      251       -2     
+ Partials       71       70       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@askpt askpt requested review from a team, arttonoyan, beeme1mr, benjiro, chrfwow, kinyoklion and toddbaert and removed request for a team October 22, 2025 10:53
@askpt askpt added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 29, 2025
Merged via the queue into open-feature:main with commit 4b965dd Oct 29, 2025
23 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] Providing a Policy Name Selector without a Provider causes an infinite loop

3 participants