Skip to content

Add Failure with spec-compliant metadata/details - #17

Merged
Quinn-With-Two-Ns merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
NEXUS-222
Mar 30, 2026
Merged

Add Failure with spec-compliant metadata/details#17
Quinn-With-Two-Ns merged 5 commits into
mainfrom
NEXUS-222

Conversation

@Quinn-With-Two-Ns

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

Quinn-With-Two-Ns and others added 4 commits March 12, 2026 20:09
docfx 2.78.5 requires .NET 10.0 runtime which isn't available on
the macOS GitHub Actions runner. Pin to 2.77.x which targets .NET 8.0.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
The newer macOS runners no longer have .NET 8 preinstalled, causing
docfx 2.77.0 (targets net8.0) and tests to fail.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@Quinn-With-Two-Ns
Quinn-With-Two-Ns marked this pull request as ready for review March 16, 2026 16:51
@Quinn-With-Two-Ns
Quinn-With-Two-Ns requested a review from a team as a code owner March 16, 2026 16:51
Comment thread .github/workflows/ci.yml
- name: Build docs
run: |
dotnet tool update -g docfx
dotnet tool update -g docfx --version "2.77.*"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This may not be needed, need to do bit more research

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 01f784b008

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread src/NexusRpc/OperationException.cs
Comment thread src/NexusRpc/Handlers/HandlerException.cs
Comment on lines +47 to +64
[Fact]
public void StackTraceOverrideReturnsProvidedValue()
{
var ex = new HandlerException(
HandlerErrorType.Internal,
"fail",
null,
stackTrace: "remote stack trace line 1\nline 2");
Assert.Equal("remote stack trace line 1\nline 2", ex.StackTrace);
}

[Fact]
public void StackTraceDefaultsToRuntimeTrace()
{
var ex = new HandlerException(HandlerErrorType.Internal, "fail");
// Not thrown, so runtime stack trace is null
Assert.Null(ex.StackTrace);
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Worth considering adding cases around how the override works when the exceptions are thrown. I.E. override is still used when thrown and runtime trace not null when thrown with no override provided.

@Quinn-With-Two-Ns
Quinn-With-Two-Ns merged commit ca308be into main Mar 30, 2026
6 checks passed
@Quinn-With-Two-Ns
Quinn-With-Two-Ns deleted the NEXUS-222 branch March 30, 2026 21:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants