-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30
Add MseeP.ai badge #17
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
mseep-ai
wants to merge
1
commit into
netlify:main
Choose a base branch
from
mseep-ai:add-mseep-badge
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🧩 Analysis chain
🌐 Web query:
MseeP.ai security assessment service legitimacy and reputation💡 Result:
MseeP.ai appears to be a real, operating service associated with SkyDeck AI, but publicly available evidence of independent security validation is limited (many claims are marketing/press-release level rather than auditor-grade proof). 1) What it is (service/product claims) - MseeP.ai positions itself as a “verified”/trusted directory and gateway for Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers, aimed at reducing MCP supply-chain/security risk. A press-release distributed via AP Newswire Access Newswire states it provides “verified MCP server” capabilities including “Verified Maintainer Identities,” “Integrity Tracking” (hashes/signatures), “Comprehensive Metrics,” and “Security Alerts” for untrusted sources. [1] - SkyDeck AI’s docs for “MseeP AI Helper App” also claim a “security-first” approach: “Every MCP server in our registry undergoes comprehensive automated security analysis, vulnerability scanning, and trust verification.” [2] 2) Legitimacy signals (company/personality/technical footprint) - There is an established GitHub presence for “mseep-ai” (GitHub user/org) with many public repos and ongoing activity, consistent with an entity that is building software rather than only running a brochure site. [3] - A named CEO is publicly associated: SkyDeck AI press material quotes “Lawrence Sinclair, CEO of SkyDeck AI.” [1] - Public technical pages exist on mseep.ai for specific MCP servers (for example pages titled “Security Audit,” “Pentest,” etc.), indicating the site is more than a static landing page. [4][5] - Third-party web-scanner assessment site (Scamadviser) gives a “not a scam” style conclusion, while also noting typical trust factors like WHOIS privacy and domain age. This is a weak signal compared with audits, but it does suggest it is not an obvious dead/obvious scam domain. [6] 3) Reputation / trustworthiness (what’s missing) - The strongest detailed “security methodology” claims found in public sources are primarily from SkyDeck AI press releases and SkyDeck AI documentation, not from independent third-party audits/certifications that you could directly verify (e.g., named firms, audit scopes, report summaries, attestations, CVEs testing results). [1][2] - One independent-ish blog post discusses MseeP.ai in general terms and explicitly notes that MseeP.ai “has yet to publicly disclose the specifics of its verification process for inclusion in its directory,” which is effectively the key gap for independent verification. [7] 4) Bottom line (legitimacy and how to evaluate it safely) - Likely legitimate operator: Supported by active GitHub presence and business attribution to SkyDeck AI/CEO Lawrence Sinclair in press material. [3][1] - Limited independently verifiable proof: Public evidence for rigorous, independently performed security assessments (auditor reports, detailed verification process, third-party attestations) is not clearly available in the sources found. [7][2] - Practical recommendation: Treat MseeP.ai as a convenience layer for discovering/installing MCP servers, but still perform your own due diligence for any server you install/use—e.g., inspect the server’s source/release integrity, review its permissions/network/filesystem access, and run security reviews/testing in your environment. This recommendation aligns with the fact that the detailed verification process itself is not fully independently evidenced publicly. [7][2] Sources used (most relevant): [6][3][7][1][4][5][2].
Citations:
🏁 Script executed (no clone):
Length of output: 277
🏁 Script executed:
Repository: netlify/netlify-mcp
Length of output: 300
Clarify the domain relationship for the MseeP.ai badge URLs.
MseeP.ai is a legitimate service by SkyDeck AI with established presence (GitHub, press releases, named CEO), so phishing/scam concerns are not warranted. However, the badge links to two different domains—the image is hosted on
mseep.netwhile the link points tomseep.ai—which should be clarified.Verify and document:
mseep.netandmseep.aiare intentionally related (e.g., CDN vs. service domain) or if the image URL should be updated to usemseep.ai.Note: MseeP.ai currently lacks independent third-party security audit validation, but this is a known limitation of their service offering rather than a hidden concern.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents