Summary
ultrafuzz status and ultrafuzz stats disagree about the same run. A node that was interrupted by an operator-requested ultrafuzz cancel is counted as other by status and as failed by stats.
Asking "did anything fail?" gives a different answer depending on which command you ask.
Observed
One run, cancelled on a timer while two nodes were mid-flight:
$ ultrafuzz status --project . linux-run2
Progress: 3% (8 finished / 0 running / 212 pending / 0 failed / 2 other / 222 total)
$ ultrafuzz status --project . linux-run2 --json
{"percent": 3, "finished": 8, "in_progress": 0, "pending": 212,
"failed": 0, "skipped": 0, "remaining": 214, "total": 222}
$ ultrafuzz stats linux-run2 --project .
12 succeeded
2 failed <-- threat-model, setup-foundry
77 pending
status is right. Both nodes were interrupted by the cancel, not by any failure of their own:
error: "CLI aborted See https://smithers.sh/reference/errors"
warn child process interrupted process:/usr/local/bin/bun runId=ultrafuzz-linux-run2
Neither node had failed on its own terms; each was executing when cancellation arrived.
Why it is worth fixing
A cancelled campaign is a normal outcome -- a time-boxed run, a budget stop, an operator changing their mind. Reporting the nodes that happened to be executing at that moment as failed invites a hunt for a defect that does not exist. I went looking for two bugs before finding CLI aborted in the log and realising the cancel had caused both.
It also makes the two views hard to reconcile: status says nothing failed, stats names two failures, and nothing in either output explains the difference.
stats additionally lists 91 rows against a 222-node graph -- presumably only nodes with recorded attempts -- which is reasonable on its own, but combined with the conflicting failed count it makes the two commands look like they are describing different runs.
Expected
A node interrupted by cancellation should be reported distinctly from one that failed -- cancelled, aborted, or interrupted -- in stats as it already is in status. Failing that, the two commands should at least agree on the count.
Environment
Host — macOS 26.6.2 (Darwin 25.6.0) arm64; podman 6.0.2 client, applehv machine, 4 CPU / 8 GiB / 60 GB
Podman VM — podman server 6.0.2 linux/arm64; kernel 7.1.3-200.fc44.aarch64 (Fedora CoreOS 44); crun 1.28
Container — docker.io/library/node:24-bookworm (sha256:78b162211207872503ea9245188122b815150b9b4380e47a7c4a447332c01660), Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm), aarch64, running as uid 1000, --memory 7g --cpus 4
Toolchain — node v24.20.0, pnpm 11.1.1, bun 1.4.0, forge 1.8.1, git 2.39.5, claude 2.1.258 (subscription, authMethod: claude.ai)
Ultrafuzz — main (8b985b90) plus #1083, built in-image
Target — morpho-org/metamorpho-v1.1 @ 89de526, default audit profile, claude-opus-5
Summary
ultrafuzz statusandultrafuzz statsdisagree about the same run. A node that was interrupted by an operator-requestedultrafuzz cancelis counted asotherbystatusand asfailedbystats.Asking "did anything fail?" gives a different answer depending on which command you ask.
Observed
One run, cancelled on a timer while two nodes were mid-flight:
statusis right. Both nodes were interrupted by the cancel, not by any failure of their own:Neither node had failed on its own terms; each was executing when cancellation arrived.
Why it is worth fixing
A cancelled campaign is a normal outcome -- a time-boxed run, a budget stop, an operator changing their mind. Reporting the nodes that happened to be executing at that moment as
failedinvites a hunt for a defect that does not exist. I went looking for two bugs before findingCLI abortedin the log and realising the cancel had caused both.It also makes the two views hard to reconcile:
statussays nothing failed,statsnames two failures, and nothing in either output explains the difference.statsadditionally lists 91 rows against a 222-node graph -- presumably only nodes with recorded attempts -- which is reasonable on its own, but combined with the conflictingfailedcount it makes the two commands look like they are describing different runs.Expected
A node interrupted by cancellation should be reported distinctly from one that failed --
cancelled,aborted, orinterrupted-- instatsas it already is instatus. Failing that, the two commands should at least agree on the count.Environment
Host — macOS 26.6.2 (Darwin 25.6.0) arm64; podman 6.0.2 client,
applehvmachine, 4 CPU / 8 GiB / 60 GBPodman VM — podman server 6.0.2 linux/arm64; kernel 7.1.3-200.fc44.aarch64 (Fedora CoreOS 44); crun 1.28
Container —
docker.io/library/node:24-bookworm(sha256:78b162211207872503ea9245188122b815150b9b4380e47a7c4a447332c01660), Debian GNU/Linux 12 (bookworm), aarch64, running as uid 1000,--memory 7g --cpus 4Toolchain — node v24.20.0, pnpm 11.1.1, bun 1.4.0, forge 1.8.1, git 2.39.5, claude 2.1.258 (subscription,
authMethod: claude.ai)Ultrafuzz —
main(8b985b90) plus #1083, built in-imageTarget —
morpho-org/metamorpho-v1.1@89de526, default audit profile,claude-opus-5