y.tab.c - Use strchr() because index() is a deprecated POSIX function #1090
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Since index() is deprecated in POSIX and not part of the C standard library, we should use strchr() ... strchr() is part of the C standard library. index() is a now deprecated POSIX function. The POSIX specification recommends implementing index() as a macro that expands to a call to strchr(). Since index() is deprecated in POSIX and not part of the C standard library, you should use strchr(). ... ... char *index(const char *, int); /* LEGACY, see strchr */ ... https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4291149/difference-between-string-h-and-strings-h = = = . . . strings.h comes from the BSD branch in the unix evolution. Its content has been standardized by POSIX, but most of it is marked as legacy and can be easily replaced with other functions: . . . char *index(const char *, int); /* LEGACY, see strchr */ . . . = = = https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4091864/c-differences-between-strchr-and-index = = = . . . strchr() is part of the C standard library. index() is a now deprecated POSIX function. The POSIX specification recommends implementing index() as a macro that expands to a call to strchr(). Since index() is deprecated in POSIX and not part of the C standard library, you should use strchr(). . . . = = =
Contributor
Author
|
This is not tested |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Since index() is deprecated in POSIX and not part of the C standard library, we should use strchr()
...
strchr() is part of the C standard library. index() is a now deprecated POSIX function. The POSIX specification recommends implementing index() as a macro that expands to a call to strchr().
Since index() is deprecated in POSIX and not part of the C standard library, you should use strchr().
...
...
char *index(const char , int); / LEGACY, see strchr */
...
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4291149/difference-between-string-h-and-strings-h
= = =
. . .
strings.h comes from the BSD branch in the unix evolution. Its content has been standardized by POSIX, but most of it is marked as legacy and can be easily replaced with other functions:
. . .
char *index(const char , int); / LEGACY, see strchr */
. . .
= = =
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/4091864/c-differences-between-strchr-and-index
= = =
. . .
strchr() is part of the C standard library. index() is a now deprecated POSIX function. The POSIX specification recommends implementing index() as a macro that expands to a call to strchr().
Since index() is deprecated in POSIX and not part of the C standard library, you should use strchr().
. . .
= = =