Skip to content

Conversation

@MahatiC
Copy link
Member

@MahatiC MahatiC commented Sep 25, 2025

  • This addresses some of the review comments from the original pull request and a command line fix related to SecurityPolicy.

Signed-off-by: Mahati Chamarthy <[email protected]>
@MahatiC MahatiC force-pushed the securitypolicy-review branch from 0e7cadb to 95ea954 Compare September 25, 2025 12:39
@MahatiC MahatiC marked this pull request as ready for review September 25, 2025 17:22
@MahatiC MahatiC requested a review from a team as a code owner September 25, 2025 17:22
@MahatiC
Copy link
Member Author

MahatiC commented Oct 16, 2025

@ambarve @rawahars Could you have a look at this?

@MahatiC MahatiC requested a review from anmaxvl October 31, 2025 11:52
@MahatiC
Copy link
Member Author

MahatiC commented Nov 6, 2025

@msscotb Can this get a reviewer assigned please?

@anmaxvl anmaxvl self-assigned this Nov 12, 2025
if isInitExec {
// if this is an exec of Container command line, then it's already enforced
// during container creation, hence skip it here
c.commandLineExec = true
Copy link
Contributor

@anmaxvl anmaxvl Nov 12, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is this basically "init process started" indicator? or rather "init process start attempted"

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

also, is the assumption that no out of order exec requests will come?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Requests are handled sequentially by gcs-sidecar. Also, isInitExec is a misnomer as it has nothing to do with init, I have changed the variable name. This is specifically to differentiate the exec at start container vs other exec processes.

@MahatiC MahatiC force-pushed the securitypolicy-review branch from 95ea954 to d7e2efe Compare November 12, 2025 16:24
@MahatiC MahatiC requested a review from anmaxvl November 13, 2025 09:34
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants