Skip to content

fix(client): close response body on non-2XX in ExecStream - #344

Merged
michimani merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/close-response-body-in-exec-stream
May 17, 2026
Merged

fix(client): close response body on non-2XX in ExecStream#344
michimani merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/close-response-body-in-exec-stream

Conversation

@michimani

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

No description provided.

@michimani michimani self-assigned this May 17, 2026
@michimani
michimani merged commit 1092aa7 into main May 17, 2026
1 check passed
@michimani
michimani deleted the fix/close-response-body-in-exec-stream branch May 17, 2026 15:16
@github-actions github-actions Bot mentioned this pull request May 17, 2026
@codecov-commenter

Copy link
Copy Markdown

⚠️ Please install the 'codecov app svg image' to ensure uploads and comments are reliably processed by Codecov.

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.85%. Comparing base (426355a) to head (bdacaf6).
⚠️ Report is 14 commits behind head on main.
❗ Your organization needs to install the Codecov GitHub app to enable full functionality.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #344      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   95.39%   95.85%   +0.45%     
==========================================
  Files         101      101              
  Lines        3603     2964     -639     
==========================================
- Hits         3437     2841     -596     
+ Misses        126       83      -43     
  Partials       40       40              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants