Repository navigation
Linter: Implement actionview-no-redundant-local-assigns rule - #2014
Merged
Merged
Conversation
🌿 Interactive Playground and Documentation PreviewA preview deployment has been built for this pull request. Try out the changes live in the interactive playground: 🌱 Grown from commit ✅ Preview deployment has been cleaned up. |
commit: |
This branch was successfully deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request implements the
actionview-no-redundant-local-assignsrule, which reportslocal_assignslookups in a partial that already has a<%# locals: (...) %>declaration, where the declaration makes the lookup either redundant or dead.local_assignsstays useful in a partial that has a strict locals declaration, so this is deliberately not a rule againstlocal_assignsitself. What it targets are the lookups the declaration already answers: a required local is a local variable, so reading it back out of the hash is a longer way to write the name, and it is always present, so askingkey?about it is a condition that can only take one branch. A name the declaration does not mention can never arrive at all, since Rails raisesActionView::StrictLocalsErrorfor callers that pass an undeclared local, which makes the lookup dead code.Resolves #2011