Skip to content

muse-image-brief: new port, version 1.0.0 - #33747

Draft
FosterMartyn735 wants to merge 1 commit into
macports:masterfrom
FosterMartyn735:muse-image-brief-new-port
Draft

muse-image-brief: new port, version 1.0.0#33747
FosterMartyn735 wants to merge 1 commit into
macports:masterfrom
FosterMartyn735:muse-image-brief-new-port

Conversation

@FosterMartyn735

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Description

Add a new port for Muse Image Brief 1.0.0, a dependency-free command-line validator for structured JSON image briefs. The source archive is public at https://github.com/FosterMartyn735/muse-image-brief and contains an MIT license, documentation, and four unit tests.

This is a new Portfile submission. No existing Trac ticket is required.

Type(s)
  • bugfix
  • enhancement
  • security fix
Tested on

No macOS host is available in the current environment. The source command and its four unit tests pass with Python, but port lint, port test, and a full MacPorts install have not been claimed; the official PR CI is requested for those checks.

Verification

Have you

  • followed our Commit Message Guidelines?
  • squashed and minimized your commits?
  • checked that there are no other open pull requests for the same change?
  • referenced existing tickets on Trac? (not applicable: new PR submission)
  • checked your Portfile with port lint? (no macOS/MacPorts host available)
  • tried existing tests with sudo port test? (awaiting CI)
  • tried a full install with sudo port -vst install? (awaiting CI)
  • tested basic functionality of the command and its unit tests?

Add a dependency-free command-line validator for structured JSON image briefs.
@reneeotten

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

I notice that the the upstream GitHub repository exists for 2 weeks, the first commit to the repository was 14 hours ago and it's released as version 1.0.0.

What is the exact purpose of this? I sincerely doubt that we are interested in including this..

@reneeotten
reneeotten marked this pull request as draft July 30, 2026 03:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants