-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 67
add sglang-diffusion blogpost on two months' progress #291
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
blog/2026-01-16-sglang-diffusion.md
Outdated
| within the community. We are deeply grateful for the extensive feedback and growing number of contributions from | ||
| open-source developers. | ||
|
|
||
| Over the past two months, we've been meticulously building sglang-diffusion, and here is a summary of our progress: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
mention some version numbers here? e.g. v0.5.7
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| Since its release in early November, **SGLang-Diffusion** has gained significant attention and widespread adoption | ||
| within the community. We are deeply grateful for the extensive feedback and growing number of contributions from |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
mention perf speedup in the very beginning (e.g., 2x faster than the initial release)
blog/2026-01-16-sglang-diffusion.md
Outdated
| - We compared the performance of SGLang-Diffusion with all popular models (including the SGLang-Diffusion in | ||
| 06/11/2025). **SGLang-Diffusion** delivers the fastest speed across all popular models, up to 5x compared to others. | ||
| - We compared the performance of SGLang-Diffusion under different hardware and parallelism setting with one of the | ||
| fastest vendor. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
On the date format of the benchmark figures.
06/11/2025 is confusing, it can be June or Nov. You can just use Nov. 6, 2025
|
Add AMD at least! |
No description provided.