Skip to content

Data streams v2 uniffi - #1286

Draft
1egoman wants to merge 24 commits into
mainfrom
data-streams-v2-uniffi
Draft

Data streams v2 uniffi#1286
1egoman wants to merge 24 commits into
mainfrom
data-streams-v2-uniffi

Conversation

@1egoman

@1egoman 1egoman commented Jul 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Adds data streams v2 to the livekit-uniffi crate, and exposes it fairly similarly to how data tracks works.

I've also for now added a python test script (It's the most complete bindgen set up in this project which I am familiar with) which exercises this api as an example of what it would look like in practice. I'll remove this before an eventual merge, but I thought it would be useful for reviewers:

$ python3 datastream_uniffi_test.py
--- OUTGOING:
PACKETS: [b'jP\n$4a501804-960c-4d54-94df-81784ffab6b1\x10\xc6\xa5\xb0\xaf\xf93\x1a\x04test"\ntext/plain(\x0bJ\x00Z\x0bhello world']
--- INCOMING:
TEXT STREAM OPENED: alice CONTENTS: hello world

Base automatically changed from data-streams-v2 to main July 28, 2026 20:11
@1egoman
1egoman force-pushed the data-streams-v2-uniffi branch from 29ffd71 to 7ef488b Compare July 28, 2026 20:52
@1egoman
1egoman marked this pull request as ready for review July 28, 2026 20:52
@1egoman
1egoman requested a review from ladvoc as a code owner July 28, 2026 20:52
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Changeset ✓

This PR includes a changeset covering all affected packages:

Package Bump
livekit patch
livekit-data-stream patch
livekit-datatrack patch
livekit-ffi patch
livekit-uniffi patch

@1egoman
1egoman requested a review from pblazej July 28, 2026 20:52
devin-ai-integration[bot]

This comment was marked as resolved.

@pblazej

pblazej commented Jul 29, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

My suggested approach here is to just open a draft PR to consumers e.g. swift and then polish it - that's what I did for data tracks before.

Otherwise the reviewer must generate the bindings anyway, as it's very hard to predict the edge cases around concurrency, memory management, etc.

I'd be super happy to take a look at both in parallel.

@1egoman
1egoman force-pushed the data-streams-v2-uniffi branch from f28049b to d1c8eff Compare July 30, 2026 18:10

@devin-ai-integration devin-ai-integration Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Devin Review found 4 new potential issues.

View 2 additional findings in Devin Review.

Open in Devin Review

Comment thread livekit-uniffi/src/data_stream/incoming.rs
Comment thread livekit-uniffi/src/data_stream/incoming.rs Outdated
Comment thread livekit-uniffi/src/lib.rs
Comment on lines +18 to +19
/// Data streams v2 core from [`livekit-data-stream`].
pub mod data_stream;

@devin-ai-integration devin-ai-integration Bot Jul 30, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟡 Pull request is missing the required changeset file

No changeset file was added for this change (new module registered at livekit-uniffi/src/lib.rs:19), even though the repository requires every pull request to include one listing the crates that need a version bump.
Impact: Release tooling will not record or version this new functionality.

Repository rule

AGENTS.md ("Documenting changes"): "Every PR needs a changeset" and "Changeset must list any crates which need to be bumped stemming from the change". The diff adds livekit-uniffi/src/data_stream/* and a new dependency in livekit-uniffi/Cargo.toml, but .changeset/ contains only pre-existing entries (fix-publisher-renegotiation-deadlock.md, fix_nvenc_dynamic_bitrate_updates.md, fix_uniffi_android_package_build.md).

Add a changeset (e.g. via knope document-change) listing livekit-uniffi.

Open in Devin Review

Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.

Comment thread livekit-uniffi/src/data_stream/incoming.rs Outdated

@devin-ai-integration devin-ai-integration Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Devin Review found 2 new potential issues.

View 3 additional findings in Devin Review.

Open in Devin Review

Comment on lines +73 to +81
/// Handles an encoded [`livekit_protocol::DataPacket`] received over the data channel.
///
/// Fire-and-forget: the packet is decoded and enqueued in order; processing happens on the
/// manager's run loop. Non-data-stream or undecodable packets are ignored.
pub fn handle_packet_received(&self, packet: Bytes) {
if let Some(event) = decode_data_packet(&packet) {
let _ = self.input.send(event.into());
}
}

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟡 Readers can wait forever when the sending participant leaves mid-stream

There is no way for the host app to tell the receiver that a participant has left (no equivalent of the abort input used elsewhere, only handle_packet_received at livekit-uniffi/src/data_stream/incoming.rs:77), so a half-received stream is never ended and a pending read never returns.
Impact: If a sender disconnects in the middle of a stream, an app awaiting the stream contents hangs indefinitely and the partially received stream is retained.

The Rust room implementation aborts streams on disconnect; the FFI has no such entry point

The incoming actor supports ds::incoming::InputEvent::AbortStreamsFrom(identity), which the livekit crate sends when a remote participant disconnects (livekit/src/room/mod.rs:2269), causing the descriptor to be dropped and the reader's channel to error/close.

IncomingDataStreamManager only exposes handle_packet_received, so a foreign host cannot deliver that event. Consequently ByteStreamReader::read_all/next (livekit-uniffi/src/data_stream/incoming.rs:105-117) and the text equivalents (:141-153) await a chunk that will never arrive, while holding the reader's tokio mutex, and the manager keeps the open-stream descriptor alive.

Fix: expose a method such as handle_participant_disconnected(identity: String) that sends InputEvent::AbortStreamsFrom.

Prompt for agents
IncomingDataStreamManager in livekit-uniffi/src/data_stream/incoming.rs only exposes handle_packet_received, but the underlying incoming actor also accepts ds::incoming::InputEvent::AbortStreamsFrom(ParticipantIdentity), which the livekit crate sends on remote participant disconnect (see livekit/src/room/mod.rs:2269). Without an FFI entry point for it, foreign hosts cannot terminate in-flight streams whose sender left, leaving readers awaiting chunks forever and descriptors retained in the manager. Add a synchronous exported method that forwards an identity as InputEvent::AbortStreamsFrom, documented as required on participant disconnect.
Open in Devin Review

Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.

Comment thread livekit-uniffi/src/data_stream/common.rs Outdated
I think this is going to be a lot cleaner, and mean that other platforms
like swift can handle "internal" data streams in their own way

@devin-ai-integration devin-ai-integration Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Devin Review found 2 new potential issues.

View 3 additional findings in Devin Review.

Open in Devin Review

Comment on lines +54 to +58
#[uniffi::constructor]
pub fn new(
delegate: Arc<dyn IncomingDataStreamManagerDelegate>,
max_payload_byte_length: Option<u64>,
) -> Arc<Self> {

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟡 Newly exposed constructors lack the required documentation

The two entry points foreign callers must use to create the stream managers are exported without any description (pub fn new at livekit-uniffi/src/data_stream/incoming.rs:55 and livekit-uniffi/src/data_stream/outgoing.rs:84), so the generated bindings' documentation has nothing explaining their arguments.
Impact: Users of the generated bindings get undocumented constructors, including no explanation of the optional size limit argument.

Repository rule

AGENTS.md ("API changes") requires: "New APIs should have idiomatic doc comments — All new functions and types should have at least a one-line description". Every other exported method in these two files carries a doc comment; only the #[uniffi::constructor] pub fn new items do not (livekit-uniffi/src/data_stream/incoming.rs:54-58, livekit-uniffi/src/data_stream/outgoing.rs:83-87).

Suggested change
#[uniffi::constructor]
pub fn new(
delegate: Arc<dyn IncomingDataStreamManagerDelegate>,
max_payload_byte_length: Option<u64>,
) -> Arc<Self> {
/// Creates a manager, spawning its actor loop on the global runtime.
///
/// `max_payload_byte_length` caps the size of any single incoming stream; the crate default is
/// used when `None`.
#[uniffi::constructor]
pub fn new(
delegate: Arc<dyn IncomingDataStreamManagerDelegate>,
max_payload_byte_length: Option<u64>,
) -> Arc<Self> {
Open in Devin Review

Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.

Comment on lines +352 to +366
pub(crate) fn decode_data_packet(bytes: &[u8]) -> Option<ds::incoming::PacketReceived> {
let mut packet = proto::DataPacket::decode(bytes).ok()?;
let identity: common::ParticipantIdentity = packet.participant_identity.clone().into();
let ds_packet = match packet.value.take()? {
proto::data_packet::Value::StreamHeader(header) => ds::Packet::Header {
header: header.into(),
encryption_type: common::EncryptionType::None,
},
proto::data_packet::Value::StreamChunk(chunk) => {
ds::Packet::Chunk { chunk: chunk.into(), encryption_type: common::EncryptionType::None }
}
proto::data_packet::Value::StreamTrailer(trailer) => ds::Packet::Trailer(trailer.into()),
_ => return None,
};
Some(ds::incoming::PacketReceived::new(ds_packet, identity))

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🟨 Incoming data-stream packets are treated as unencrypted regardless of the packet's encryption state

decode_data_packet hardcodes common::EncryptionType::None for every decoded header/chunk packet (livekit-uniffi/src/data_stream/common.rs:352-366), so the incoming manager's encryption-type consistency check (descriptor.encryption_type != encryption_type, livekit-data-stream/src/incoming/manager.rs:377-380) can never detect a mismatch, and encrypted payloads would be surfaced to the application as plaintext bytes. The behavior is documented as a follow-up ("the foreign side is expected to hand us already-decrypted packets"), but nothing in the FFI enforces or signals that contract.

Open in Devin Review

Was this helpful? React with 👍 or 👎 to provide feedback.

1egoman added 5 commits July 31, 2026 16:39
Expose all the different error cases so consuming clients can get better quality
errors.
This uses tokio for one (so it's not portable), but also had some
security flaws (allowed paths like ../../evil.txt). So, remove it.
@1egoman
1egoman marked this pull request as draft July 31, 2026 20:49
@1egoman
1egoman removed the request for review from ladvoc July 31, 2026 20:49
@1egoman
1egoman force-pushed the data-streams-v2-uniffi branch from b0113f2 to 76f1e16 Compare July 31, 2026 20:52
1egoman added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 3, 2026
… `livekit-data-stream` (#1304)

While working on #1286, I realized I made a bit of a mess of the "internal" data stream concept when extracting `livekit-data-stream` out into its own crate. This pull request attempts to address this.

**Currently, what happens today:** `livekit-data-stream`'s `IncomingDataStreamManager` takes a list of `INTERNAL_DATA_STREAM_TOPICS`. These are topics used internally for v2 rpc requests / responses and messages associated with these data streams
are not exposed to the user. They are filtered in two places:
- Within `IncomingDataStreamManager` to conditionally expose both
`InputEvent::ChunkReceived` and `InputEvent::TrailerReceived` for non
internal topics
- Within `RoomSession` to expose which `InputEvent::StreamOpened` events
are exposed to the user. Doing this here meant that "internal" data
streams could be intercepted at this level and fed into rpc / etc.

This is messy - it's a little hard to follow and the filtering is split
into these two places / some code duplication. What really made this
untenable though was that exposing this internal state over uniffi in
#1286 became particularly challenging, since you _do_ want to expose
"internal" events downstream in this case - if you didn't, the uniffi
consuming client couldn't handle rpc v2 / etc!

**What this pull request does:** Now, `livekit-data-stream` knows
nothing about "internal" or "not internal" data streams, and includes
the raw `topic` of each stream in the associated event. This allows all
the filtering to be centralized downstream in `RoomSession`. This fixes
all of these previously mentioned problems and is a lot easier to reason
about!
… FFI

Add an AbortAllStreams input event to the incoming data-stream backend and
expose abort_all_streams() / abort_streams_from(identity) on the UniFFI
IncomingDataStreamManager, so the host can fail open readers on disconnect or
participant-leave instead of letting them hang (which would also stall an
ordered topic's queue).

Also fix the constructor to take Option<u64> (UniFFI can't lift usize) and drop
the stale reserved_topics argument to Manager::new.
@1egoman
1egoman force-pushed the data-streams-v2-uniffi branch from 4e938c0 to 38503a8 Compare August 5, 2026 16:43
1egoman added 2 commits August 5, 2026 16:05
Add ByteStreamWriter/TextStreamWriter.is_open() to the UniFFI outgoing writers, backed by
RawStream.is_closed(). RawStream now also marks itself closed when a chunk send fails (not only on
an explicit close), so a writer whose room disconnected mid-send reports closed instead of open.
Generating Kotlin bindings for the data stream FFI produces a file that does not
compile. Nobody had done it before -- packages/kotlin has never existed in this
tree -- so this went unnoticed while Swift, Python and Node worked fine.

Two collisions, fixed differently:

  - An exported Rust method named `close` collides with the non-suspend `close()`
    uniffi synthesizes for AutoCloseable. They differ only by `suspend`, which
    Kotlin rejects as conflicting overloads. Fixed with
    [bindings.kotlin.rename], so Kotlin sees `closeStream()` and every other
    language keeps `close()`.

  - An error variant field named `message` collides with the `message` override
    uniffi emits from Throwable, and their types differ (String vs String?) so
    they cannot be merged. This one cannot be fixed from uniffi.toml: uniffi keys
    the rename table by crate name but looks up enum and record members by the
    item's full module path, so a rename for anything in a submodule is accepted
    and silently dropped. (Methods are unaffected because they key off the crate
    name -- which is why the fix above works.) There is no field-level
    #[uniffi(name)] attribute either, so the field is renamed to `reason` in the
    Rust source.

Renaming the field changes the exposed API, so consumers reading it by name need
updating. Swift is not one of them: its mapping binds these positionally.

Verified by generating Kotlin bindings and compiling them into the Android AAR
with no post-processing, then running that AAR's data stream tests on device.
@1egoman
1egoman force-pushed the data-streams-v2-uniffi branch from e121d38 to 1fe0eba Compare August 6, 2026 20:47
Waiting for some fixes to be unstreamed before this can be swapped back
over to the mainline build
This "shim" adapts the data streams v2 interface given dart's c ffi
limitations (a Pointer.fromFunction callback is only invocable while the
calling thread is inside a native call that Dart itself initiated).
See comments in diff explaining why, it seems to be broken in
our current uniffi release version.
@@ -6,6 +6,48 @@ android = true
package_name = "io.livekit.uniffi"

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this be com.livekit.uniffi in the future?

@pblazej pblazej left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I integrated this on the Swift side (livekit/client-sdk-swift#1075) and it works end-to-end. Compression and single-packet inlining both kick in correctly once capabilities round-trip, which I verified on the wire.

Below are five gaps in the FFI surface I hit while wiring it up, ordered by what they cost a host rather than by size. None of them blocks the integration; #1 and #2 are the two that cost correctness rather than convenience, and both look cheaper to close now than after this ships and hosts have worked around them.

Comment thread livekit-uniffi/src/data_stream/incoming.rs
#[uniffi::export(with_foreign)]
pub trait OutgoingDataStreamManagerDelegate: Send + Sync {
/// Encoded [`livekit_protocol::DataPacket`]s to be sent over the data channel transport.
fn on_packets_available(&self, packets: Vec<Bytes>);

@pblazej pblazej Aug 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The () return. You flag this at line 93 already; noting the cost so it can be weighed rather than discovered. write() can't throw when a packet doesn't reach the wire (the Swift API documents that it does), is_open() can't go false on a send failure, and there's no back-pressure — the responder acks once the host has buffered, not sent, so a producer looping on write() queues unboundedly. Host-side bounding isn't an option, since dropping stream packets is worse than the memory. A Result-returning delegate covers all three.

The Vec. It's always exactly one packet — the pump does on_packets_available(vec![packet]) per recv(). The plural signature implies batching that never happens, so every host writes a loop that runs once. Either make it singular or actually batch; batching would also make in-batch ordering free and cut the per-packet foreign round trip.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Re batching - let me see what I can do to send multiple packets at once here. For context, my aim was to match the data track PacketsAvailable interface here which takes a Vec<Bytes>.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For the Result so that you can pass back up send failures - I've added a Result<(), SendError> return to on_packets_available in 1dd54d0. I opted to reuse the existing SendError error type, although that has the downside of dropping any sort of "reason" type string. Maybe I could add a log or add that reason string? I'm open to others perspectives here.

For batching, as mentioned above, I've kept Vec<Bytes>, but I've changed this so that the vec sending path is used in send_text / send_bytes. With time this could be expanded but I think this is a good initial use case which also keeps it aligned with PacketsAvailable in the data track subsystem.

@pblazej pblazej Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Prototyped rather than just suggested — pushed as 7a2505f.

A sync callback can't deliver what the doc promises. "Return once handed to the transport" needs a synchronous transport; Swift's is async throughout, so honoring it means blocking a Rust runtime thread via a primitive that SDK forbids. The only implementable choice was to ack on buffering — so back-pressure and transport errors went unimplemented and is_open could never go false.

Four lines: #[async_trait::async_trait], async fn, .await at the call site. uniffi keeps the trait dyn-compatible itself; async-trait was already in the lockfile. Hosts get simpler too — ordering becomes structural, so Swift deleted its pump.

Verified: 104 + 12 Rust tests; 144 Swift tests clean under TSan and LIBDISPATCH_COOPERATIVE_POOL_STRICT=1; and a case untestable before — after disconnect write() throws and isOpen is false, where both previously reported success on an unwritable stream.

Unverified: Kotlin/Dart impact, async-trait now a direct dep.

Comment thread livekit-uniffi/src/data_stream/common.rs Outdated
Comment thread livekit-uniffi/src/data_stream/incoming.rs
Comment thread livekit-uniffi/src/data_stream/incoming.rs
1egoman and others added 6 commits August 17, 2026 16:09
… FFI

The incoming manager previously signaled wire-level stream closure only via
the deprecated TrailerReceived output, which the FFI layer intentionally does
not forward — leaving hosts that deliver streams on ordered topics (e.g.
transcription) no way to know when a stream's handler chain can advance, so a
still-open stream would head-of-line-block every later stream from that
sender. A trailer alone is also insufficient: inline single-packet streams
never receive one.

Add a StreamClosed output event emitted exactly once per opened stream on
every terminal path (trailer close, inline completion, error, abort) and
surface it through IncomingDataStreamManagerDelegate::on_stream_closed plus a
next_closed_stream() pull on the polled adapter.
…tch one-shot sends

OutgoingDataStreamManagerDelegate::on_packets_available returned (), so a
packet that never reached the wire could not fail the originating call:
write() couldn't throw, is_open() couldn't go false on a send failure, and the
responder acked once the host had merely buffered — letting a producer looping
on write() queue unboundedly. The delegate now returns
Result<(), PacketDeliveryError> (a dedicated error carrying a host-provided
reason, convertible into DataStreamError::Internal); throwing it fails the
originating send_*/write call with SendFailed and closes the affected stream,
and returning only after handing packets to the transport is what provides
back-pressure.

The Vec<Bytes> signature also always carried exactly one packet. Keep the
shape (matching the data-track PacketsAvailable interface) but make it true:
the packet channel now carries ordered batches acknowledged as a whole.
One-shot sends (send_text/send_bytes) emit their entire stream — header,
chunks, trailer — as a single request, i.e. one FFI crossing per send; every
other call site (incremental writers, send_file's unbuffered streaming, inline
sends) sends vec![packet].
…ry it in mismatch errors

The FFI decode path hard-coded EncryptionType::None, and it cannot do better
from the bytes alone: encrypted_packet is a member of the DataPacket.value
oneof, so a host decrypting E2EE traffic replaces it with the decrypted stream
packet — by the time the bytes reach the FFI, the field is absent from the
wire format. That made the encryption guard in handle_chunk dead code over the
FFI while still reading as active.

handle_packet_received now requires the encryption type the host received (or
decrypted) the packet with, making the guard live. EncryptionTypeMismatch also
gains expected/received fields so hosts can report which types disagreed
instead of fabricating them (Swift's error carries both).
The cap has no setter, and on the host side it typically comes from
per-connection options that aren't final until connect and can differ between
sessions of the same host object. The obvious host implementation — construct
lazily, memoize for the object's lifetime — silently pins the cap to the first
session's value. Document the intended pattern (rebuild the manager per
session) instead of adding reconfiguration complexity.
There was no way to observe how many incoming streams are open, so tests
exercising the abort paths had to infer "open" by signalling from inside a
handler — which measures handler-dispatched rather than descriptor-registered
and breaks if the two ever move relative to each other.

The count is answered through the manager's input queue, so it is processed
in order with previously enqueued packets: feed a header (or an abort), then
await open_stream_count() to know it has landed, no sleeps or handler
side-channels needed. Inline single-packet streams complete during header
handling and are never counted.
…contract

The delegate documents that it returns only once the packets have reached the
transport, which is what orders packets, bounds a producer, and lets a failed
send fail the originating `send_*`/`write`. A synchronous callback can't deliver
that on hosts whose transport is async: the Swift SDK has no synchronous send
path, so honoring it would mean blocking the calling thread on an async result —
a Rust runtime thread, via a synchronisation primitive that SDK forbids. The
practical outcome was that hosts acknowledged on buffering, leaving
back-pressure and transport errors unimplemented.

uniffi supports async methods on foreign traits: it applies `#[async_trait]` to
the generated impl and dispatches through `foreign_async_call`, so the trait
stays dyn-compatible. Awaiting the call in the pump keeps packets strictly
ordered, since the next one isn't pulled until this returns.

`async-trait` was already in the lockfile through livekit-api and livekit-net.
The in-tree implementors — the Dart polling adapter and the test doubles —
become `async fn` and are otherwise unchanged.

Verified against the Swift SDK (client-sdk-swift#1075): generates
`func onPacketsAvailable(packets:) async throws`, lets the host delete its
ordering pump entirely, and a stream whose transport goes away now fails its
`write` and reports `isOpen == false`, neither of which was observable before.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@pblazej

pblazej commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Pushed 7a2505f, which makes on_packets_available an async fn — a synchronous callback can't honor the contract documented above it on hosts whose transport is async — with the reasoning, verification and open Kotlin/Dart question in the thread below; revert freely if you'd rather it went another way.

handle_chunk rejects a chunk whose encryption doesn't match its stream's
header, but trailers carried no encryption type at all — so in an E2EE room,
an unencrypted peer could close another participant's encrypted stream cleanly
and inject trailer attributes while doing so. The SDKs' hand-rolled v1
implementations (web, and the Android port's SDK-side check) validated
trailers; the core did not, which blocked deleting those host-side checks.

Packet::Trailer now carries the encryption type like Header and Chunk, the
livekit crate threads it through Session/Engine events (it was already in
hand at the emit site), and the manager rejects a mismatched trailer with
EncryptionTypeMismatch before merging its attributes.
The arm64-v8a slice is 1490 KiB with the data streams v2 surface (async
foreign-trait dispatch, stream-closed and open-stream-count, trailer
encryption checks), over the 1280 KiB budget set in May before that work.
cargo's strip = "symbols" is already applied to the artifact, so AGP's strip
pass has nothing further to remove — the growth is real surface, landed
intentionally.
@1egoman

1egoman commented Aug 18, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

FYI @pblazej - 1da01b4 was an issue I found when updating the android implementation to take into account the changes from your review. I think it may have some implications on the swift version as it changes the format of the Packet::Trailer message to include encryption_type. See the commit message for more about the exact context about what was fixed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants