Improve search visibility and styling#522
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Rohita <rohitak.srimayee@gmail.com>
✅ Deploy Preview for krkn-chaos ready!Built without sensitive environment variables
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
Review Summary by Qodo
WalkthroughsDescription• Prevent duplicate search result popovers when switching between search inputs • Increase search input visibility with darker borders and consistent styling • Enhance search results modal with improved border styling and visibility • Add dark theme styling for form controls and search inputs Diagramflowchart LR
A["Search Input"] -->|"Remove duplicate popovers"| B["Improved Visibility"]
C["Form Controls"] -->|"Add dark theme styling"| D["Enhanced Styling"]
E["Search Results Modal"] -->|"Increase border thickness"| F["Better Visual Hierarchy"]
B --> G["Better UX"]
D --> G
F --> G
File Changes1. layouts/_partials/navbar.html
|
Code Review by Qodo
Context used✅ Compliance rules (platform):
24 rules 1. Global form styles overridden
|
…ity-improvements Signed-off-by: Rohita <rohitak.srimayee@gmail.com>
d610638 to
d2e356c
Compare
|
Hi @paigerube14, I've submitted this PR and would appreciate a review when convenient. Please let me know if any changes are needed. |
Signed-off-by: Rohita <rohitak.srimayee@gmail.com>
|
Sorry for not catching this earlier. After looking at it further, I realized I was only testing at normal zoom levels. At normal zoom, the issue was masked because clicking the sidebar search causes the navbar search overlay to close via the backdrop click handler, so duplicate search UIs are not visible. After increasing the browser zoom, I was able to reproduce the same overlapping search behavior shown in your screenshot. To address this, I updated the search handling so that the behavior no longer depends on the backdrop interaction:
I've pushed the latest changes addressing the issue. Whenever you have a chance, could you please take another look and let me know if everything looks good now? |
Signed-off-by: Lovelace <61972457+Lovlace777@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: Rohita <rohitak.srimayee@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Paige Patton <prubenda@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Rohita <rohitak.srimayee@gmail.com>
3491367 to
04e83c1
Compare
Signed-off-by: Rohita <rohitak.srimayee@gmail.com>
|
@paige I've updated my branch with the latest changes from main. Could you please review the PR again when you have a chance? Thanks! |
|
Updated the PR with the latest changes. Ready for review! |
* Fix Mermaid theme selection based on site theme Signed-off-by: Rohita <rohitak.srimayee@gmail.com> * fix(mermaid): rerender diagrams on theme change Signed-off-by: Rohita <rohitak.srimayee@gmail.com> * Fix Mermaid theme toggle rendering Signed-off-by: Rohita <rohitak.srimayee@gmail.com> --------- Signed-off-by: Rohita <rohitak.srimayee@gmail.com>
f17aa9e to
ae2a971
Compare
…ity-improvements Signed-off-by: Rohita <rohitak.srimayee@gmail.com>
|
I've merged the latest upstream changes and updated the branch. Can you review it again? Thanks! |
…ity-improvements Signed-off-by: Rohita <rohitak.srimayee@gmail.com>
|
Hi @rohIta-k! 👋 One or more commits in this PR are missing a Unsigned commits:
To fix, rebase and sign off all commits: git rebase HEAD~1 --signoff
git push --force-with-leaseOr, to sign off every commit in this PR at once: git rebase origin/main --signoff
git push --force-with-lease
The |

Changes
Related Issue
Attached Before and After screenshots in the issue.