Skip to content

Clarify CUA harness usage - #10

Merged
rgarcia merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
hypeship/clarify-agent-harness-readme
May 13, 2026
Merged

Clarify CUA harness usage#10
rgarcia merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
hypeship/clarify-agent-harness-readme

Conversation

@rgarcia

@rgarcia rgarcia commented May 13, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • clarify when to use direct Agent control versus the harness shape
  • note that CuaHarness is currently a thin wrapper that installs CUA defaults and adds transcript access

Tests

  • Not run (docs-only change).

Note

Low Risk
Docs-only changes that clarify API guidance; no runtime behavior or data/security-sensitive code is modified.

Overview
Clarifies README guidance on when to use CuaAgent vs the harness shape by spelling out the kinds of control/features each implies (raw agent control vs app-layer helpers and higher-level queue/events).

Explicitly notes that CuaHarness is currently a thin wrapper that installs CUA defaults, delegates runtime methods to the wrapped Agent, and adds getTranscript().

Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 26b3d13. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.

@rgarcia
rgarcia marked this pull request as ready for review May 13, 2026 19:24
@rgarcia
rgarcia merged commit 7df5044 into main May 13, 2026
3 checks passed
@firetiger-agent

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Firetiger deploy monitoring skipped

This PR didn't match the auto-monitor filter configured on your GitHub connection:

Any PR that changes the kernel API. Monitor changes to API endpoints (packages/api/cmd/api/) and Temporal workflows (packages/api/lib/temporal) in the kernel repo

Reason: This is a docs-only change clarifying CUA harness usage, with no modifications to API endpoints or Temporal workflows.

To monitor this PR anyway, reply with @firetiger monitor this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant