docs: propose resource v1 direct-resolution format#956
Open
shadstoneofficial wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
docs: propose resource v1 direct-resolution format#956shadstoneofficial wants to merge 1 commit into
shadstoneofficial wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
This drafts a resource version
1direct-resolution proposal as a successor discussion to the narrow HIP018 / Rerecord A and AAAA prototype in #955.The proposal follows the path suggested in the #955 discussion: avoid stretching version
0ordering behavior further, and instead define a clean direct-resolution format with labels, TTL handling, and a vetted initial record set.Scope
This is intentionally a docs/spec PR, not an implementation PR.
It sketches:
0behavior unchanged;1for direct-resolution records;_443._tcp.example.;A,AAAA,TLSA,HTTPS,SVCB, andMXas possible v1 records;Relationship to #955
#955 remains useful as a prototype and test reference for direct A/AAAA resolution. If maintainers prefer the v1 path, this proposal can supersede that narrow v0-compatible implementation path before any larger code changes are made.
Non-goals
This does not propose supply, locked-fund, foundation, tokenomics, tree interval, or arbitrary zone-file changes.