[RFC] Add API for setting adaptive quantization parameters #107
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This allows for setting the adaptive quantization bias multiplier and offset parameters . Together with using custom base quantization tables, this allows you to tune jpegli to deliver better compression rates for specific datasets or metrics.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This allows for setting the adaptive quantization bias multiplier and offset parameters . Together with using custom base quantization tables, this allows you to tune jpegli to deliver better compression rates for specific datasets or metrics.
Description
I added "RFC" to the title since I'm not sure what's the best approach for adding test coverage.
I could add support to cjpegli but it's quite a niche use case so I'm not sure this is the best place for it, otherwise a unit test may be more suitable.
The change has been tested using a separate command line tool that includes jpegli, however all that testing was done on grayscale images.