Skip to content

Conversation

@ericchiang
Copy link
Contributor

Was chatting with @brandonweeks who mentioned go-tpm uses a different CI and expressed interest in github actions.

@ericchiang ericchiang requested a review from a team as a code owner March 30, 2023 20:34
Was chatting with @brandonweeks who mentioned go-tpm uses a different CI
and expressed interest in github actions.
@chrisfenner
Copy link
Member

@josephlr @alexmwu do either of you have context on why the current CI uses Cirrus instead of GH Actions?

@alexmwu
Copy link
Contributor

alexmwu commented Apr 4, 2023

@josephlr @alexmwu do either of you have context on why the current CI uses Cirrus instead of GH Actions?

Joe introduced this to both go-tpm-tools and go-tpm: google/go-tpm-tools#39, #126.

go-tpm-tools has since migrated to GH Actions (google/go-tpm-tools#135), so I don't see any special reason to use Cirrus CI. I don't have additional context and would just be guessing :).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants