-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 488
Add memory flag to metaSPAdes for better RAM handeling #7363
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
SantaMcCloud
wants to merge
2
commits into
galaxyproject:main
Choose a base branch
from
SantaMcCloud:metaspade_update
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is not a good idea to expose memory parameters to users. Instead this needs to be set up as a rule in TPV configs by admins. You can refer to some examples here https://github.com/usegalaxy-eu/infrastructure-playbook/blob/ee168ba226433d32f033663eaffb4e0a979fe694/files/galaxy/tpv/tools.yml
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This it a tool Limit such that certain hasmaps or so will be reduce to handle the the tool better.
@paulzierep can give you a better overview about it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm with @SaimMomin12. Also it is already set here
tools-iuc/tools/spades/macros.xml
Line 117 in 9fc4d01
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ah I did not check weather the wrapper already got this flag. I this case we can drop this PR, question would be why the tool then still fails due to memory, maybe we should reduce it a bit to make sure its below the Galaxy provided memory.
Another question is whether this option changes the assembly logic, e.g. automatically use less kmers. If so we should reconsider the logic here, since that would mean, that TPV adjusts memory -> other -m paramter -> different assembly -> not reproducible. Will check with the devs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FYI: ablab/spades#1535
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thats another question entirely, but I would say like in this case, we cannot directly allow it, but maybe with some encoding or as file metadata ... still no idea tbh :)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
-10GB seems quite a lot. Could we ask upstream for a reasonable value.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think at a point it was the default option to use only 90% but i can ask them if they have a good idea for this. But we can also have different ratio for it like only remove 1 GB from it which will act as a buffer
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ablab/spades#1536
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Provide me please with a patch, a single line that I need to add to the current wrapper on EU, and we can test it in real-life.