Skip to content

test(antithesis): use certified projection horizons (EN-1946) - #1892

Open
gfyrag wants to merge 1 commit into
feat/en-1946-remove-leader-consistencyfrom
test/en-1946-antithesis-projection-horizons
Open

test(antithesis): use certified projection horizons (EN-1946)#1892
gfyrag wants to merge 1 commit into
feat/en-1946-remove-leader-consistencyfrom
test/en-1946-antithesis-projection-horizons

Conversation

@gfyrag

@gfyrag gfyrag commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Stack 6/7 for EN-1946. Migrates Antithesis assertions from the client-selected minimum log sequence to default linearizable reads backed by certified projection horizons. The stale fault scenario remains unchanged.

@NumaryBot

NumaryBot commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

✅ Approve — automated review

The changes consistently migrate Antithesis assertions to default linearizable, projection-aligned reads without introducing an actionable regression.

No findings.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 77.07%. Comparing base (e538a48) to head (62ab75f).

Additional details and impacted files
@@                            Coverage Diff                             @@
##           feat/en-1946-remove-leader-consistency    #1892      +/-   ##
==========================================================================
- Coverage                                   77.20%   77.07%   -0.14%     
==========================================================================
  Files                                         478      478              
  Lines                                       51502    51502              
==========================================================================
- Hits                                        39764    39696      -68     
- Misses                                       8275     8351      +76     
+ Partials                                     3463     3455       -8     
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 77.07% <ø> (-0.14%) ⬇️
scenario 77.07% <ø> (-0.14%) ⬇️
unit 77.07% <ø> (-0.14%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@gfyrag
gfyrag force-pushed the feat/en-1946-remove-leader-consistency branch from 13a8aab to e538a48 Compare September 4, 2026 11:25
@gfyrag
gfyrag force-pushed the test/en-1946-antithesis-projection-horizons branch from c90c64f to 62ab75f Compare September 4, 2026 11:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants