Skip to content

Conversation

@justincavery
Copy link

Added commented out multiple RPC method mappings for clarity.

We were moving from an nginx configuration which allowed for all methods to be passed through and found it difficult to define the right list for proxyd to support our Graph Indexers.

Added commented out multiple RPC method mappings for clarity. 

We were moving from an `nginx` configuration which allowed for all methods to be passed through and found it difficult to define the right list for `proxyd` to support our Graph Indexers.
@justincavery justincavery requested a review from a team as a code owner November 7, 2025 14:02
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 58.43%. Comparing base (2256f8a) to head (4453f19).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #504      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   58.38%   58.43%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files          91       91              
  Lines       13064    13064              
==========================================
+ Hits         7628     7634       +6     
+ Misses       4986     4981       -5     
+ Partials      450      449       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
proxyd 72.60% <ø> (+0.13%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.
see 1 file with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants