feat(discussion): Bulk delete with Ban at course or org level #55
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull request introduces a new Django admin interface and database migration to support discussion moderation features, including user bans, ban exceptions, and moderation audit logs. The changes add three new models—
DiscussionBan,DiscussionBanException, andDiscussionModerationLog—with corresponding admin configurations that enforce strict permissions and auditability. These updates are designed to improve moderation workflows and compliance in discussion forums.Discussion Moderation Models and Admin Interfaces:
DiscussionBan,DiscussionBanException, andDiscussionModerationLogto represent user bans, exceptions to bans, and audit logs for moderation actions. The models include fields for user references, course or organization scope, reasons, timestamps, and moderator info.Django Admin Permissions and Usability:
ReadOnlyForNonSuperuserMixin, making the admin read-only for staff (view-only for audit/support) and full-access only for superusers. The moderation log admin is strictly read-only for all users, even superusers, to maintain audit integrity.Migration and Schema Management: