Resample with geometry#101
Conversation
|
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
|
Hey @leewujung this notebook uses some data from EV. The data is used to compare the resampling function to the way that it is handled in EV. Should I keep it in or add it to a test in EchoPype ? |
|
Closes #82 |
|
Hi @eliascapriles-NOAA, thanks for that! I’ll take a look soon! Also, @leewujung and I discussed this and we think it might be better to have the comparison with EV directly in echopype CI, with some EV-processed data added to the GitHub assets, so that we can test the agreement between both methods directly in echopype (correct me if i'm wrong Wu-Jung!) If we’re happy with the validation there, we could then simply demonstrate its use in this notebook. Let us know what you think, and we can jump on a quick call to discuss this further! Cheers! |
|
Hi @eliascapriles-NOAA, I've proposed a new version of the notebook, using the same dataset as the "Getting Started" notebook since it provides a better example (i think) with frequencies that have different maximum recording depths. Let me know what you think and we can easily adapt it if needed! @leewujung, same: if you have time, let us know what you think! We can adjust the notebook or merge it if everyone is happy with it! P.S. don't pay too much attention to the other additions (dependencies, gallery, TOC, etc.), they're related to RTD changes associated with other PRs that I brought along while running some local tests. Cheers! |
|
Hey @LOCEANlloydizard I loved the new notebook. Thank you for the effort on it ! |
|
@eliascapriles-NOAA team work! |
Add notebook using new resample function