Skip to content

Conversation

lwsinclair
Copy link

@lwsinclair lwsinclair commented Oct 13, 2025

Hi there,

This pull request shares a security update on portaljs-mcp-server.

We also have an entry for portaljs-mcp-server in our directory, MseeP.ai, where we provide regular security and trust updates on your app.

We invite you to add our badge for your MCP server to your README to help your users learn from a third party that provides ongoing validation of portaljs-mcp-server.

You can easily take control over your listing for free: visit it at https://mseep.ai/app/datopian-portaljs-mcp-server.

Yours Sincerely,

Lawrence W. Sinclair
CEO/SkyDeck AI
Founder of MseeP.ai
MCP servers you can trust


MseeP.ai Security Assessment Badge

Here are our latest evaluation results of portaljs-mcp-server

Security Scan Results

Security Score: 83/100

Risk Level: moderate

Scan Date: 2025-10-13

Score starts at 100, deducts points for security issues, and adds points for security best practices

Detected Vulnerabilities

Medium Severity

  • @reown/appkit

    • ['@reown/appkit-controllers', '@reown/appkit-pay', '@reown/appkit-scaffold-ui', '@reown/appkit-ui', '@reown/appkit-utils', '@reown/appkit-wallet', '@walletconnect/types', '@walletconnect/universal-provider']
    • Fixed in version: unknown
  • @reown/appkit-controllers

    • ['@reown/appkit-wallet', '@walletconnect/universal-provider']
    • Fixed in version: unknown
  • @reown/appkit-pay

    • ['@reown/appkit-controllers', '@reown/appkit-ui', '@reown/appkit-utils']
    • Fixed in version: unknown
  • ... and 17 more medium severity vulnerabilities

This security assessment was conducted by MseeP.ai, an independent security validation service for MCP servers. Visit our website to learn more about our security reviews.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added a Security Assessment Badge to the top of the project README. The badge links to a live security assessment page, making the current security status visible from the repository landing page. No functional or runtime changes; this is a presentation-only update to aid quick verification when browsing the repository.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 13, 2025

Walkthrough

Added a security assessment badge (MseeP.ai) link/image to the top of README.md. No code or API changes; documentation markup only.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Docs: README badge
README.md
Inserted MseeP.ai Security Assessment Badge at the top of the README; presentation-only update.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

A badge now gleams where headers stay,
I thump in joy—hip hop, hooray!
No code to tweak, no tests to run,
Just shiny marks beneath the sun.
Carrot-approved, the README’s neat—
Stamp of trust on every feat. 🥕✨

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title Check ✅ Passed The title “Add MseeP.ai badge” succinctly and accurately describes the main change of the pull request, which is the addition of the security assessment badge to the README. It is clear, specific, and free of unnecessary words, enabling teammates to immediately grasp the update’s purpose.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changes. Docstring coverage check skipped.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6b3d253 and 3a0b01e.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant