-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
test: fix intermittent qt test failure #7021
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
✅ No Merge Conflicts DetectedThis PR currently has no conflicts with other open PRs. |
WalkthroughThis pull request updates test data in the address book test file by replacing literal string values and search patterns. Test labels are changed from containing "io" to "i0" (e.g., "io - new A" becomes "i0 - new A"), and search queries are similarly updated from "io" to "i0" while preserving their wildcard patterns. Test assertions and verification logic remain unmodified. Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes This change involves straightforward, repetitive literal string replacements in test data within a single file. No logic modifications, control flow changes, or functional behavior updates are present. Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used📓 Path-based instructions (2)src/**/*.{cpp,h,hpp,cc}📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)
Files:
src/qt/**/*.{cpp,h}📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)
Files:
🧠 Learnings (1)📓 Common learnings⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (7)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
kwvg
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK 262ea3a
PastaPastaPasta
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
utACK 262ea3a
Issue being fixed or feature implemented
qt tests fail sometimes: https://github.com/UdjinM6/dash/actions/runs/19789400004/job/56700920992#step:10:203
The reason is
iois a valid set of base58 characters (ybEBNswQyMLQPjMXN6ytuRetioxS4CrAu2is a valid address for example), so one of preexisting addresses can match the filter and row count check will fail.What was done?
Use non-base58 character
io->i0How Has This Been Tested?
Breaking Changes
n/a
Checklist: