- 
          
 - 
                Notifications
    
You must be signed in to change notification settings  - Fork 91
 
Contiguous scope #2101
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Contiguous scope #2101
Changes from 36 commits
fdcd03e
              f223d84
              b549ca5
              a71f017
              da8d6ec
              a3fa351
              53351e8
              d370690
              48f97ee
              e2ec5c8
              d1020a8
              02a295e
              9d75ead
              48c7a65
              fa57ab2
              c943542
              c26d704
              e0b6b5b
              2988adb
              c2f942b
              34cbbb1
              8b5a95f
              bd86a64
              5a905ea
              6612818
              2852e37
              d3eb687
              fe7e8e5
              2f15dc6
              0ccdcc6
              fd93230
              d898f26
              ea5a542
              66731e4
              58bfb9a
              b6ac60f
              17b0507
              6f0de5c
              9f156a6
              38ab206
              883eb1e
              File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | 
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,164 @@ | ||
| import { | ||
| Direction, | ||
| Position, | ||
| Range, | ||
| ScopeType, | ||
| TextEditor, | ||
| next, | ||
| } from "@cursorless/common"; | ||
| import { Target } from "../../../typings/target.types"; | ||
| import { ensureSingleTarget } from "../../../util/targetUtils"; | ||
| import { constructScopeRangeTarget } from "../constructScopeRangeTarget"; | ||
| import { BaseScopeHandler } from "./BaseScopeHandler"; | ||
| import type { TargetScope } from "./scope.types"; | ||
| import type { | ||
| CustomScopeType, | ||
| ScopeHandler, | ||
| ScopeIteratorRequirements, | ||
| } from "./scopeHandler.types"; | ||
| 
     | 
||
| export class ContiguousScopeHandler extends BaseScopeHandler { | ||
| protected readonly isHierarchical = false; | ||
| 
     | 
||
| constructor(private scopeHandler: ScopeHandler) { | ||
| super(); | ||
| } | ||
| 
     | 
||
| get scopeType(): ScopeType | undefined { | ||
| return this.scopeHandler.scopeType; | ||
| } | ||
| 
     | 
||
| get iterationScopeType(): ScopeType | CustomScopeType { | ||
| return this.scopeHandler.iterationScopeType; | ||
| } | ||
| 
     | 
||
| *generateScopeCandidates( | ||
| editor: TextEditor, | ||
| position: Position, | ||
| direction: Direction, | ||
                
      
                  AndreasArvidsson marked this conversation as resolved.
               
          
            Show resolved
            Hide resolved
         | 
||
| _hints: ScopeIteratorRequirements, | ||
| ): Iterable<TargetScope> { | ||
| let targetRangeOpposite = next( | ||
| generateTargetRangesInDirection( | ||
| this.scopeHandler, | ||
| editor, | ||
| position, | ||
| direction === "forward" ? "backward" : "forward", | ||
| ), | ||
| ); | ||
| 
     | 
||
| const targetRangesIter = generateTargetRangesInDirection( | ||
| this.scopeHandler, | ||
| editor, | ||
| position, | ||
| direction, | ||
| ); | ||
| 
     | 
||
| for (const targetRange of targetRangesIter) { | ||
| if ( | ||
| targetRangeOpposite != null && | ||
| isAdjacent(targetRangeOpposite.proximal, targetRange.proximal) | ||
| ) { | ||
| yield combineScopes(targetRangeOpposite.distal, targetRange.distal); | ||
| targetRangeOpposite = undefined; | ||
| } else { | ||
| yield combineScopes(targetRange.proximal, targetRange.distal); | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| 
     | 
||
| function combineScopes(scope1: TargetScope, scope2: TargetScope): TargetScope { | ||
| if (scope1.domain.isRangeEqual(scope2.domain)) { | ||
| return scope1; | ||
| } | ||
| 
     | 
||
| return { | ||
| editor: scope1.editor, | ||
| domain: scope1.domain.union(scope2.domain), | ||
| getTargets: (isReversed) => { | ||
| return constructScopeRangeTarget(isReversed, scope1, scope2); | ||
| }, | ||
| }; | ||
| } | ||
| 
     | 
||
| function* generateTargetRangesInDirection( | ||
| 
         There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'm not convinced this function is correct. Eg corner cases like single scope not adjacent to others that's last in the file. To me it looks like if you've already yielded anything, then the final yield after the loop body won't fire. Some proper unit tests for  There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Actually might make sense to hold off on unit tests for the following reasons: 
 There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Update from discussion today: 
 There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. 
 looking at these test cases, i think it should die There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Sounds good. Any opinion on making single-line comments behave this way by default? (Ie auto expand to all comments that aren't separated by an empty line) There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Update from meet-up: let's do the following: (
  (comment) @comment
  (#match? @comment "^//")
  (#contiguous! @comment)
)
(comment) @commentWe both don't love this option or the option in this PR, but it's the best we can do with what we have today. Fwiw we would prefer something like (
  (comment) @comment
  ($if
    (#match? @comment "^//")
    (#contiguous! @comment)
  )
)but that's a bit out of scope here 😅  | 
||
| scopeHandler: ScopeHandler, | ||
| editor: TextEditor, | ||
| position: Position, | ||
| direction: Direction, | ||
| ): Iterable<{ proximal: TargetScope; distal: TargetScope }> { | ||
| let proximal, distal: TargetScope | undefined; | ||
| 
     | 
||
| const generator = scopeHandler.generateScopes(editor, position, direction, { | ||
| allowAdjacentScopes: true, | ||
| skipAncestorScopes: true, | ||
| }); | ||
| 
     | 
||
| for (const scope of generator) { | ||
| if (proximal == null) { | ||
| proximal = scope; | ||
| } | ||
| 
     | 
||
| if (distal != null) { | ||
| if (!isAdjacent(distal, scope)) { | ||
| yield { proximal, distal }; | ||
| proximal = scope; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| 
     | 
||
| distal = scope; | ||
| } | ||
| 
     | 
||
| if (proximal != null && distal != null) { | ||
| yield { proximal, distal }; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| 
     | 
||
| function isAdjacent(scope1: TargetScope, scope2: TargetScope): boolean { | ||
| if (!scope1.contiguous || !scope2.contiguous) { | ||
| return false; | ||
| } | ||
| 
     | 
||
| if (scope1.domain.isRangeEqual(scope2.domain)) { | ||
| return true; | ||
| } | ||
| 
     | 
||
| const [startTarget, endTarget] = getTargetsInDocumentOrder( | ||
| 
         There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This file is now general enough to be used with most scopes. If we wanted to we could remove a bunch of code here and rely on the fact that we only use it for comments. I could go either way.  | 
||
| ensureSingleTarget(scope1.getTargets(false)), | ||
| ensureSingleTarget(scope2.getTargets(false)), | ||
| ); | ||
| 
     | 
||
| const leadingRange = | ||
| startTarget.getTrailingDelimiterTarget()?.contentRange ?? | ||
| startTarget.contentRange; | ||
| const trailingRange = | ||
| endTarget.getLeadingDelimiterTarget()?.contentRange ?? | ||
| endTarget.contentRange; | ||
| 
     | 
||
| if (leadingRange.intersection(trailingRange) != null) { | ||
| return true; | ||
| } | ||
| 
     | 
||
| // Non line targets are excluded if they are separated by more than one line | ||
| if ( | ||
| !startTarget.isLine && | ||
| trailingRange.start.line - leadingRange.end.line > 1 | ||
| ) { | ||
| return false; | ||
| } | ||
| 
     | 
||
| // Finally targets are excluded if there is non whitespace text between them | ||
| const rangeBetween = new Range(leadingRange.end, trailingRange.start); | ||
| const text = startTarget.editor.document.getText(rangeBetween); | ||
| return /^\s*$/.test(text); | ||
| } | ||
| 
     | 
||
| function getTargetsInDocumentOrder( | ||
| target1: Target, | ||
| target2: Target, | ||
| ): [Target, Target] { | ||
| return target1.contentRange.start.isBefore(target2.contentRange.start) | ||
| ? [target1, target2] | ||
| : [target2, target1]; | ||
| } | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought you were using a query predicate for this now
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We use both. I don't know how to check it at this stage. When we actually fetch the matched scope it's to late to inject this handler. Not without a lot of rewrites at least.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry I'm not following how you would use both. When do you use one vs the other?
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This code decides to use the handler. Then the scope.contiguous is used to determine when to merge two scopes. That way we can ignore block comments.
cursorless/packages/cursorless-engine/src/processTargets/modifiers/scopeHandlers/ContiguousScopeHandler.ts
Line 119 in b6ac60f