⚡️ Speed up method AES._pad by 23%
#144
Open
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 23% (0.23x) speedup for
AES._padinskyvern/forge/sdk/encrypt/aes.py⏱️ Runtime :
89.2 microseconds→72.8 microseconds(best of250runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimization replaces the inefficient padding creation pattern with a more direct approach, achieving a 22% speedup by eliminating unnecessary list allocation.
Key Change:
padding = bytes([padding_length] * padding_length)followed byreturn data + paddingreturn data + bytes([padding_length]) * padding_lengthWhy This Is Faster:
The original code creates an intermediate list
[padding_length] * padding_length(e.g.,[5, 5, 5, 5, 5]for padding_length=5) and then converts it to bytes. This involves:The optimized version uses
bytes([padding_length]) * padding_length, which:bytes([padding_length])This eliminates the intermediate list allocation and leverages Python's optimized bytes repetition, which is implemented in C and avoids Python-level iteration.
Performance Impact:
The line profiler shows the padding creation line improved significantly - the total function time decreased from 255.4μs to 213.2μs. Test results demonstrate consistent 10-35% speedups across various input sizes, with particularly strong improvements for edge cases like empty inputs (34.4% faster) and small data sizes.
Test Case Benefits:
The optimization performs well across all scenarios:
This suggests the optimization is universally beneficial for the PKCS#7 padding operation regardless of input characteristics.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-AES._pad-mjab2rc4and push.