⚡️ Speed up method OneNoteDataSource.users_delete_onenote by 7%
#1092
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 7% (0.07x) speedup for
OneNoteDataSource.users_delete_onenoteinbackend/python/app/sources/external/microsoft/one_note/one_note.py⏱️ Runtime :
894 microseconds→833 microseconds(best of164runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimized code achieves a 7% runtime improvement through two key optimizations:
1. Streamlined Error Handling in
_handle_onenote_responseThe original code used intermediate variables (
success = True,error_msg = None) and a single return statement at the end. The optimized version eliminates these variables by returning immediately when error conditions are detected. This reduces:2. Conditional Query Parameter Creation in
users_delete_onenoteThe original code always created a
RequestConfiguration()object for query parameters, even when no parameters were provided. The optimized version only creates this object when actual query parameters exist:This optimization is particularly effective for the common case where most API calls don't use query parameters, avoiding unnecessary object instantiation overhead (10.3% → 1.6% time reduction in query parameter handling).
Performance Impact Analysis:
The line profiler shows the optimizations work best when:
The test results demonstrate consistent improvements across basic success cases, error handling scenarios, and concurrent operations. The optimization maintains identical functionality while reducing computational overhead in the most common execution paths.
Note on Throughput: While runtime improved 7%, throughput shows a slight decrease (-1.8%). This apparent contradiction likely reflects measurement variance in async operations, where the timing of individual calls versus aggregate throughput can differ due to concurrency effects and test environment factors.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-OneNoteDataSource.users_delete_onenote-mjaerqiaand push.