Skip to content

Conversation

@codeflash-ai
Copy link

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Dec 7, 2025

📄 30% (0.30x) speedup for string_concat in src/algorithms/string.py

⏱️ Runtime : 650 microseconds 500 microseconds (best of 250 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

The optimization replaces string concatenation in a loop with a list comprehension followed by a single join operation, delivering a 29% speedup.

Key Performance Changes:

  1. Eliminated quadratic string concatenation: The original code's s += str(i) creates a new string object on each iteration since strings are immutable in Python. This results in O(n²) time complexity as each concatenation copies the entire existing string.

  2. Replaced with linear list building + join: The optimized version uses [str(i) for i in range(n)] to build a list of strings in O(n) time, then performs a single ''.join(s) operation that efficiently allocates the final string size upfront.

Why This Works:

  • List comprehensions are optimized at the C level and avoid Python loop overhead
  • str.join() pre-calculates the total string length and allocates memory once, eliminating the repeated allocations and copying of the original approach
  • The time complexity improves from O(n²) to O(n)

Performance Evidence:
The line profiler shows the optimization particularly benefits larger inputs - the original code spent 54.4% of time in string concatenation operations, while the optimized version completes the entire operation in just 573 nanoseconds vs 5,456 nanoseconds total.

Test Case Effectiveness:
This optimization especially benefits the large-scale test cases (test_concat_large_n_100, test_concat_large_n_1000) where the quadratic behavior of string concatenation becomes more pronounced. Small inputs (n < 10) see modest gains, but larger inputs will see exponentially better performance.

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 🔘 None Found
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 47 Passed
⏪ Replay Tests 🔘 None Found
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 🔘 None Found
📊 Tests Coverage 100.0%
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
from __future__ import annotations

# imports
import pytest  # used for our unit tests
from src.algorithms.string import string_concat

# unit tests

# --- Basic Test Cases ---


def test_concat_zero():
    # Test when n = 0, should return empty string
    codeflash_output = string_concat(0)


def test_concat_one():
    # Test when n = 1, should return "0"
    codeflash_output = string_concat(1)


def test_concat_small_number():
    # Test for a small n, e.g., n = 5, should return "01234"
    codeflash_output = string_concat(5)


def test_concat_typical():
    # Test for a typical n, e.g., n = 10, should return "0123456789"
    codeflash_output = string_concat(10)


def test_concat_two_digits():
    # Test for n = 12, should include two-digit numbers
    codeflash_output = string_concat(12)


# --- Edge Test Cases ---


def test_concat_negative():
    # Test for negative n, should behave as range(0) and return ""
    codeflash_output = string_concat(-5)


def test_concat_large_single_digit():
    # Test for n = 9, should return "012345678"
    codeflash_output = string_concat(9)


def test_concat_just_before_new_digit():
    # Test for n = 10, should return "0123456789"
    codeflash_output = string_concat(10)


def test_concat_just_after_new_digit():
    # Test for n = 11, should return "012345678910"
    codeflash_output = string_concat(11)


def test_concat_input_type_float():
    # Test for float input, should raise TypeError
    with pytest.raises(TypeError):
        string_concat(5.5)


def test_concat_input_type_string():
    # Test for string input, should raise TypeError
    with pytest.raises(TypeError):
        string_concat("10")


def test_concat_input_type_none():
    # Test for None input, should raise TypeError
    with pytest.raises(TypeError):
        string_concat(None)


def test_concat_input_type_bool():
    # Test for boolean input, should treat True as 1, False as 0
    codeflash_output = string_concat(True)
    codeflash_output = string_concat(False)


def test_concat_mutation_missing_str():
    # Mutation: if str(i) is replaced with just i (int), should fail
    codeflash_output = string_concat(3)
    result = codeflash_output


# --- Large Scale Test Cases ---


def test_concat_large_n_100():
    # Test for n = 100, should include all numbers from 0 to 99 concatenated
    expected = "".join(str(i) for i in range(100))
    codeflash_output = string_concat(100)


def test_concat_large_n_999():
    # Test for n = 999, should include all numbers from 0 to 998 concatenated
    expected = "".join(str(i) for i in range(999))
    codeflash_output = string_concat(999)


def test_concat_large_n_1000():
    # Test for n = 1000, should include all numbers from 0 to 999 concatenated
    expected = "".join(str(i) for i in range(1000))
    codeflash_output = string_concat(1000)


def test_concat_performance_large_n():
    # Test for performance: n = 500 (should complete quickly)
    import time

    n = 500
    start = time.time()
    codeflash_output = string_concat(n)
    result = codeflash_output
    end = time.time()
    expected = "".join(str(i) for i in range(n))


# --- Additional Edge Cases ---


@pytest.mark.parametrize(
    "n,expected",
    [
        (2, "01"),
        (3, "012"),
        (7, "0123456"),
        (15, "01234567891011121314"),
    ],
)
def test_concat_various_small_ns(n, expected):
    # Parametrized test for a variety of small n values
    codeflash_output = string_concat(n)


def test_concat_mutation_off_by_one():
    # Mutation: if range(n) is replaced with range(n+1), should fail
    codeflash_output = string_concat(5)
    result = codeflash_output


def test_concat_mutation_wrong_order():
    # Mutation: if i is reversed, should fail
    codeflash_output = string_concat(4)
    result = codeflash_output


# codeflash_output is used to check that the output of the original code is the same as that of the optimized code.
from __future__ import annotations

# imports
import pytest  # used for our unit tests
from src.algorithms.string import string_concat

# unit tests

# ---------------------------
# 1. Basic Test Cases
# ---------------------------


def test_string_concat_zero():
    # Test with n = 0 (should return empty string)
    codeflash_output = string_concat(0)


def test_string_concat_one():
    # Test with n = 1 (should return "0")
    codeflash_output = string_concat(1)


def test_string_concat_small_positive():
    # Test with n = 5 (should return "01234")
    codeflash_output = string_concat(5)


def test_string_concat_typical():
    # Test with n = 10 (should return "0123456789")
    codeflash_output = string_concat(10)


# ---------------------------
# 2. Edge Test Cases
# ---------------------------


def test_string_concat_negative():
    # Test with n = -1 (should return empty string, as range(-1) is empty)
    codeflash_output = string_concat(-1)


def test_string_concat_large_single_digit_boundary():
    # Test with n = 10 (boundary between single and double digit numbers)
    codeflash_output = string_concat(10)


def test_string_concat_double_digit_boundary():
    # Test with n = 100 (boundary between double and triple digit numbers)
    expected = "".join(str(i) for i in range(100))
    codeflash_output = string_concat(100)


def test_string_concat_non_integer_input():
    # Test with non-integer input (should raise TypeError)
    with pytest.raises(TypeError):
        string_concat("5")
    with pytest.raises(TypeError):
        string_concat(5.0)
    with pytest.raises(TypeError):
        string_concat(None)


def test_string_concat_large_n_edge():
    # Test with n = 999 (maximum allowed for large scale test)
    expected = "".join(str(i) for i in range(999))
    codeflash_output = string_concat(999)


def test_string_concat_input_type_bool():
    # Test with boolean input (True is 1, False is 0)
    codeflash_output = string_concat(True)
    codeflash_output = string_concat(False)


def test_string_concat_input_type_object():
    # Test with an object that is not an integer (should raise TypeError)
    class Dummy:
        pass

    with pytest.raises(TypeError):
        string_concat(Dummy())


def test_string_concat_mutation_detection():
    # Test that changing the function's logic (e.g., off-by-one error) would fail this test
    # This ensures mutation testing coverage
    codeflash_output = string_concat(3)


# ---------------------------
# 3. Large Scale Test Cases
# ---------------------------


def test_string_concat_large_scale_1000():
    # Test with n = 1000 (upper limit for large scale test)
    expected = "".join(str(i) for i in range(1000))
    codeflash_output = string_concat(1000)
    result = codeflash_output


def test_string_concat_performance_sublinear_growth():
    # Test that output length grows as expected (not quadratic, etc.)
    # For n = 1000, length should be sum of digits per number
    n = 1000
    codeflash_output = string_concat(n)
    result = codeflash_output
    expected_length = sum(len(str(i)) for i in range(n))


def test_string_concat_large_scale_partial_check():
    # For n = 1000, check first and last few digits for correctness
    codeflash_output = string_concat(1000)
    result = codeflash_output


# ---------------------------
# 4. Additional Edge Cases
# ---------------------------


def test_string_concat_max_int_boundary():
    # Test with n = 2**8 (256), a power-of-two boundary
    expected = "".join(str(i) for i in range(256))
    codeflash_output = string_concat(256)


def test_string_concat_unicode_handling():
    # The function should not introduce any non-ASCII characters
    codeflash_output = string_concat(100)
    result = codeflash_output


def test_string_concat_mutation_off_by_one():
    # Ensures that the last number is n-1, not n
    n = 20
    codeflash_output = string_concat(n)
    result = codeflash_output


def test_string_concat_mutation_wrong_start():
    # Ensures that the string always starts with "0" for n > 0
    n = 10
    codeflash_output = string_concat(n)
    result = codeflash_output
    if n > 1:
        pass


# codeflash_output is used to check that the output of the original code is the same as that of the optimized code.

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-string_concat-mivnq2dv and push.

Codeflash Static Badge

The optimization replaces string concatenation in a loop with a list comprehension followed by a single join operation, delivering a **29% speedup**.

**Key Performance Changes:**

1. **Eliminated quadratic string concatenation**: The original code's `s += str(i)` creates a new string object on each iteration since strings are immutable in Python. This results in O(n²) time complexity as each concatenation copies the entire existing string.

2. **Replaced with linear list building + join**: The optimized version uses `[str(i) for i in range(n)]` to build a list of strings in O(n) time, then performs a single `''.join(s)` operation that efficiently allocates the final string size upfront.

**Why This Works:**
- List comprehensions are optimized at the C level and avoid Python loop overhead
- `str.join()` pre-calculates the total string length and allocates memory once, eliminating the repeated allocations and copying of the original approach
- The time complexity improves from O(n²) to O(n)

**Performance Evidence:**
The line profiler shows the optimization particularly benefits larger inputs - the original code spent 54.4% of time in string concatenation operations, while the optimized version completes the entire operation in just 573 nanoseconds vs 5,456 nanoseconds total.

**Test Case Effectiveness:**
This optimization especially benefits the large-scale test cases (`test_concat_large_n_100`, `test_concat_large_n_1000`) where the quadratic behavior of string concatenation becomes more pronounced. Small inputs (n < 10) see modest gains, but larger inputs will see exponentially better performance.
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from KRRT7 December 7, 2025 11:46
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash labels Dec 7, 2025
@KRRT7 KRRT7 closed this Dec 7, 2025
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot deleted the codeflash/optimize-string_concat-mivnq2dv branch December 7, 2025 11:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI 🎯 Quality: High Optimization Quality according to Codeflash

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants