⚡️ Speed up method InvertedPolarTransform.inverted by 9%
#256
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
📄 9% (0.09x) speedup for
InvertedPolarTransform.invertedinlib/matplotlib/projections/polar.py⏱️ Runtime :
124 microseconds→114 microseconds(best of10runs)📝 Explanation and details
The optimization caches attribute lookups in local variables within the
inverted()method, achieving an 8% speedup by reducing repeated attribute access overhead.Key changes:
self._axis,self._use_rmin,self._apply_theta_transforms, andPolarAxes.PolarTransformare assigned to local variables before the constructor callself._*attributes multiple times during the constructor call, the method now accesses each attribute once and reuses the cached local variablesWhy this speeds up the code:
In Python, local variable access is significantly faster than attribute lookups because local variables are stored in an array and accessed by index, while attribute access requires dictionary lookups. The line profiler shows the original code spent 84.1% of its time on the
PolarAxes.PolarTransform()line, which involved multiple attribute accesses. The optimized version distributes this cost across the local variable assignments and reduces the constructor call overhead.Performance characteristics:
The test results show consistent 10-36% improvements across different scenarios, with the most significant gains (36% and 29%) occurring in simpler test cases where the attribute lookup overhead represents a larger proportion of the total runtime. The optimization is particularly effective for repeated calls, as shown in the loop test case.
This is a classic micro-optimization that's safe to apply in performance-critical code paths, as it preserves all functionality while reducing computational overhead through better memory access patterns.
✅ Correctness verification report:
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
To edit these changes
git checkout codeflash/optimize-InvertedPolarTransform.inverted-mjcj77vxand push.